Why is no other historical figure given the dramatized Marvel supervillain treatment?
 |
 Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
|
Why is no other historical figure given the dramatized Marvel supervillain treatment?
Why is no other historical figure given the dramatized Marvel supervillain treatment?
|
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
|
Napoleon was at one point.
This. If you live in the UK, Nappy gets it too.
Because he was the main enemy to world order and establishment just like Hitler. It wasn't only brits but also russians and austrians. Napoleon got his redemption because he wasn't as moronic as Hitler and fought for an actual valid and coherent ideology that was eventually accepted and adopted, unlike nazism which was an ofshoot of a fringe uncoherent ideology that only lasted for a few decades.
didnt the rothschilds fund him?
Putin
Stan Lee was a israelite
Stanley Martin Lieber was born on December 28, 1922, in Manhattan, New York City,[2] in the apartment of his Romanian-born israeli immigrant parents, Celia (née Solomon) and Jack Lieber, at the corner of West 98th Street and West End Avenue.[3][4] Lee was raised in a israeli household
https://odysee.com/@Fashbird2814:7/Adolf-Hitler---the-front-of-an-Aryan-Humanity:7
https://odysee.com/@Fashbird2814:7/Adolf-Hitler---the-front-of-an-Aryan-Humanity:7
63 million dead, Black person
Gee I can’t imagine why. People act as though he’s single-handedly responsible for the most brutal war in history.
>wars happen because of one person and not thousands of causes which culminated into it
In a fascist dictatorship, yes. That is how it works. Are you moronic?
Ah yes the "its totalitarian in theory so it means it was so in practice"
such a moronic take.
How was it in practice?
In practice totalitarianism isnt possible. Simple as.
Explain
Maybe poles shouldn't have been slaughtering germans????
If you find out, or have a connection to Netfix money; let me know. I know a true story from the 1800's good for a 6-part limited series. Some of the roles are also click-bait for a-list walkon parts
No other historical figure was the main enemy of the guys writing the main narrative.
I quite honestly don't understand why it isn't Stalin though. Did americans fear that the cold war would turn hot if they bullied uncle Joe too much?
Too many unironic commie sympathizing leftists.
I'm literally saying that Stalin could very well be put in place of Hitler, moronic buffoon
He wasn't calling you a commie he said that Stalin worship is basically mainstream accepted so he can't be in the same category
How is the narrative written in real terms?
By the threat of social ostracism of those who write or even talk against it. Of course this threat doesn't start when the victory is achieved, it starts when the conflict starts (ideally before the first shot is actually fired though). But when one side achieves victory, the other's narratives are progressively erased.
Ok that's a part, but you talk as if there one entity that's actively pursuing this, which entity would it be?
Why would it do so? And how?
>Ok that's a part, but you talk as if there one entity that's actively pursuing this, which entity would it be?
I don't. I'm an ESL (an actual one) so that may be it. Maybe you're trying to see things that aren't there. But I won't blame you for looking for tinfoil schizos on IQfy.
Ok so I put it differently, you're describing a phenomenon, but what's its cause
Human nature. Humans are social animals that feel compeled to form communities and rely on support networks. Common narratives like that are built spontaneously in all social groups, although they normally don't concern themselves with world wars but "Sally is always late but she's a good girl".
But I imagine governments tamper with that when important things (for the government) are concerned
I disagree with that. Nixon's anti-establishment history had nearly the entire press corps against him by the time he reached the white house.
But yes on the idea that there are those who witness history and those who write it. The US 1836-1845 era is good for that; with both sides fighting it out in the history books later; with both eventually agreeing to stop mentioning the whole era at all.
I'm not american and I will refrain from saying too much since I'm probably not well informed about american issues. But I always had this impression that, since the USA was founded by a revolution led by relatively conservative people (or at least part of the leadership was relatively conservative), the american main narrative and statu quo include a somewhat schizophrenic glorification of (performative) anti-statu quo discourses. With american culture spreading due to globalization, we see this factor spreading too.
It's not really the revolution that is glorified though. Instead, the essential idea of america is the idea; and the process.
A bunch of people with skin in the game; who barely trusted each other; created a system where the average person has definite rights; and where the process which creates the leadership affords anyone with the talent and drive to succeed.
So where the UK Parliament, for example, grants its citizens the right to vote; but that is a theoretical privilege; only granted by the Crown. The idea of america is the exact opposite; that the power of the leaders comes by the permission granted by those who are being ruled.
It gets crazy because once people have life autonomy, they are just as crazy (and have the same whims) they always did.
Stalin definitely has it.
He gets the super villain treatment because he was a ridiculous super villain
Just think of how everybody in the western elites in the late 1800s and early 1900s was a racist supporter of eugenics, and how anthropology in that period was about measuring the skulls of races with calipers, and everything had to be suddenly dropped because of Hitler tainting those ideas with his genocidal lunacy.
Eugenicists still exist, but they have to disguise their ideas as progressive leftist beliefs, like the supporters of abortion who say they do it for women rights but actually do it to keep in check the reproduction of the lower classes, or Bill Gates promoting homosexuality and abortion in Central America, he says it's because of progressive beliefs, but its purpose is clearly to lower the immigration of Salvadorans and Hondurans into the USA.
Much of modern leftism, is far right eugenics that has taken the appearance of what is palatable, because Hitler ruinned the reputation of eugenicists.
>In a fascist dictatorship, yes. That is how it works. Are you moronic?
The biblical Pharoah
Judas
Nappy
Ivan Grozny
Vlad the Impaler
Any English king the Irish are whining about at a given time
Genghis Khan (and fellow steppeBlack folk like Attila or Tamerlane or whatever)
Various pirates, outlaws, bandits, mobsters, viking raiders, cannibalistic tribes etc.
All given the villain treatment
Because there are still people alive who remember fighting against him, and the nations that produce all the cultural content were his enemies
Germany, Italy and Japan all punch above their weight in terms of soft power. Of course they're in the USA's sphere and must behave like good boys. But, if memories of the war were the main cause, we would see a much more nuanced portrayal of the Axis.
We do see a more nuanced portrayal from those countries, but almost all the relevant media comes from the US or the UK
>WW2 is the creation myth of the current world order
What do you mean?
>Literal meth addict wanted to take over all of Europe and later the world establishing his schizoid ethnostate. Enslaving and exterminating other races and peoples in the process
>Both he and his subordinates are documented using the term World Domination on multiple occasions.
>shows the American continent as if Hitler gave a frick about them
Top kek
>Hitlers Plan
Retire after WW2 and focus on painting.
Bros...............................................
whoa SO WHOLESOME, we fought the wrong enemy......
Source?
There is 'some' truth to it. Hitler did wish to take a back seat to politics following the war in order to focus on his own pet projects (architecture and such) and didn't particularly like being involved with petty party politics (which he left to Bormann). That's where the whole conception of Reichsreform comes from.
is not that hitler is portrayed as a comic book supervillain
it's that comic book supervillains are portrayed as hitler
This.
You're supposed to associate the two most popular political ideas with evil.
Ethno nationalism - from the right
Socialism - from the left
The israelites fear another national socialist uprising against their "capitalism" and "diversity"
>national socialists capitalists werent turbo capitalists
Anon...
He was unironically an idiotic villain, whose ambitions and rigid ideas limited him to a collision with reality, and other peoples.
Brutus was given this treatment during the Renaissance, right down to Dante having Satan literally chewing on Brutus in Hell.
The Aztecs are
>they sacrificed 100,000 people a week and ate babies!
>Piss off everyone.
>Piss off everyone in the age of mass media advent
>Piss off everyone and they get to see the things you did to your own citizens.
>Wtf why is Hitler so dramatized?
Really makes the noggin joggin.