>Rejecting salvation from the blood of God precludes forgiveness from any other past transgression, thus unforgivable definitionally.
>rejecting the idea that the genetic code selected naturally by evolution has value, means that there is no hope at all for the future salvation of your offspring (the life that occurs after you die. ie, "after life"). The sacrifice of Jesus is all of your ancestors, (and you). You sacrifice yourself for your children. You are both a god, and the son of god, in the great assembly. The concept of natural selection is felt and understood by your free will as a judgment of "good" and "evil".
Christ means King of Israel. Why would I accept a King of Israel as my God? Of course I deny the King of Israel as my God. Why are yo worshipping a King of Israel?
1 month ago
Anonymous
If you will not accept salvation from the blood of God then by the blood of God you will find your damnation as has ever been the sentence for the children of the fall.
1 month ago
Anonymous
God has no blood, he is Holy, Spiritual. Everlasting. Eternal. He is not flesh, has never been and never will. He never came out of a woman's vegana, that is blasphemy and plain idiotic. You must not understand what God is if you think he could ever be born as a man and then die. God. Does. Not. Die.
1 month ago
Anonymous
Then you deny the Christ and are proudly damned to your fate.
1 month ago
Anonymous
I fully deny Christ. A man is not my God. My God is Yahaweh. In him I trust and in him I take refuge. I worship him and only him. He is my rock and he is my salvation.
1 month ago
Anonymous
>I fully deny Christ.
So be it then.
Matthew 10:33
But whosoever shall deny me before men, him will I also deny before my Father which is in heaven.
1 month ago
Anonymous
Jesus also said the Messiah is not a Son of David. Why should I believe someone who does not believe in God's own promise to David?
1 month ago
Anonymous
Such was answered satisfactorily by the Christ already in saying thus; >How then doth David in spirit call him Lord, saying, The Lord said unto my Lord, Sit thou on my right hand, till I make thine enemies thy footstool? If David then call him Lord, how is he his son?
So is the one both and therefore not snared by the trap the pharisees though themselves clever by setting.
1 month ago
Anonymous
He was the one who tried setting a trap to the pharisees, they were just minding their own business when Jesus approach them and asked him who they thought the the Messiah was the son of, to catch them in a gotcha. He was the trickster setting trick questions.
He ignores that the Psalm he is talking about was not talking about the Messiah but about David himself. He just did not understand the scriptures.
1 month ago
Anonymous
Then you have failed to comprehend the teaching for the Christ perceived the need to address that point with them, and they too in the end rejected the truth to their own ultimate damnation which you may in the end share.
1 month ago
Anonymous
The Christ was just a fool.
1 month ago
Anonymous
a fool would believe that.
1 month ago
Anonymous
Isn't this what the worshipers of Baal say to Elijah? Only they use the phonetic sound "Baal" instead of "Yahaweh".
1 month ago
Anonymous
Backwards, this is what Elijah said to the King and Queen of Israel when they demanded that Yahaweh's prophets submitted to Baal, and Elijah refused and was persecuted for 3 years because of it, and lived in hiding being protected by Yah.
1 month ago
Anonymous
Are you a Muslim?
The problem I see is that abstract concepts have no meaning or purpose unless they are related back to our personal experiance. Even if God does not have blood, he still owns the blood, and the blood is his, and he influences the blood. The cross is the infinitely small location where God and the blood "touch". That is where Jesus is. For a moment smaller than a microsecond, God and the blood are one, as God commands the blood. I know I'm not explaining things perfectly, but it's all I have to contribute today.
1 month ago
Anonymous
>Christ means, King of those who wrestle with God. Why would I accept the Chosen Lord of those who spar with God as my god? Of course I deny the anointed code of those who have experiance articulating with God as my god. Why would you assign worth to the natural selection of people who have a deep relationship, and experiance of interactions, with Theos and Elohim?
Redefine it as natural selection, and then argue semantics and strawmen. Then, in 2000 years, your children will ask the same question of your creation, and the paradigm will again need to be submerged in living water, and raised from the dead.
Because although the children of the fall are damned justly for the adultery committed by the father of sin they are so beloved that God provided for their salvation the blood of God in the flesh so that as one in Christ they are redeemed for their salvation and ascendance, mandated with glorification of the kingdom of heaven upon the earth established by the blood of God.
DO THESE INDIVIDUALS EVEN THINK BEFORE TYPING THEIR LITTLE QUESTIONS, INPUTTING THE CAPTCHA, AND CLICKING ON THE «POST» BUTTON? OF COURSE, THEY DO NOT.
>all-merciful
Where does it say this? God is the Most Merciful, not all merciful. There are some sins that even when he forgives you he still inflicts punishments for you to atone for it. So that the Anger of God can be appeased and your forgiveness can be justified, then it would be fair to the ones who you caused harm to. Because is also the Most Just and the Most Fair. That is why you must accept when life brings you suffering, you dont know if you were accused of your sins in heaven and God is allowing you to pay for your debt so that you can be redeemed in the day of Judgement. So that a Satan cannot accuse you of the evil you did before God in that day and oppose your salvation.
I was taught in a conservative protestant church the only unforgivable sin is a wife that commits adultery. Once she committed that sin she forever lives as an adulteress. Even if she stays in her marriage and never strays again she remains an adulteress, dies an adulteress and damned to hell.
the kingdom of heaven will be like ten virgins who took their lamps and went out to meet the bridegroom. What is it like for the virgin who is selected, if she commits adultery after being selected?
They read the bible but interpreted each line and verse to support their belief. It was a full court press mind fricking. Line by line. Here is an example. David, whos married sees another mans wife, wants to frick her so he sends her husband to the front line to be killed. We were taught Bathsheba purposefully tempted and seduced David. Shes a vile adulterous vixen and David a righteous king.
Yeah, it's about forgiveness:
Matthew 6:14-15
King James Version
14 For if ye forgive men their trespasses, your heavenly Father will also forgive you:
15 But if ye forgive not men their trespasses, neither will your Father forgive your trespasses.
Forgiveness is only necessary if something cannot be justified. So god knocks up another mans wife, a virgin no less, and its all good because the kid is gods kid. Now if the bootblack had fricked Mary behind Joes back the bootblack and Mary would be damned.
If Bill Clinton was in this thread, he would say that it depends on what the meaning of the word "is" is. Then he would wink, and go on with his buisness.
Prepare yourself for my mighty word salad:
This is OC, but you can use it to win any future debate. I give it to you free of charge.
The kingdom of heaven is like the strobe of a disco tech. When the light is on, the dancers are Jesus. When the light is off, God is doing all the other stuff in the universe that God needs to do. The strobe light pulses with infinite speed, so that there is no darkness, and no infidelity. This is how God can be a man, but also, subcontiously, take care of all the other boring shit, like counting to infinity.
In my haste to deliver this amazing revelation, I forgot to address the OP. So, the unforgivable sin is the guy who turns off the strobe light, because he wants to sit in darkness, and subcontiously count to infinity with God. He is a total buzz kill, and clearly does not understand the point of the disco tech.
Rejecting salvation from the blood of God precludes forgiveness from any other past transgression, thus unforgivable definitionally.
This would make sense if "rejecting salvation from the blood of God" didn't mean being unconvinced that any deities exist.
"rejecting salvation from the blood of God" can also mean embracing the damnation which has always accompanied the gift since the fall.
You mean suppressing the truth.
>Rejecting salvation from the blood of God precludes forgiveness from any other past transgression, thus unforgivable definitionally.
>rejecting the idea that the genetic code selected naturally by evolution has value, means that there is no hope at all for the future salvation of your offspring (the life that occurs after you die. ie, "after life"). The sacrifice of Jesus is all of your ancestors, (and you). You sacrifice yourself for your children. You are both a god, and the son of god, in the great assembly. The concept of natural selection is felt and understood by your free will as a judgment of "good" and "evil".
God has no blood. He is the Holy One.
If he owns the blood, is it his? Is there anything that does not belong to God?
Then your view is not that of truth because you deny the Christ, and so I name you israelite and damned child of the devil.
Christ means King of Israel. Why would I accept a King of Israel as my God? Of course I deny the King of Israel as my God. Why are yo worshipping a King of Israel?
If you will not accept salvation from the blood of God then by the blood of God you will find your damnation as has ever been the sentence for the children of the fall.
God has no blood, he is Holy, Spiritual. Everlasting. Eternal. He is not flesh, has never been and never will. He never came out of a woman's vegana, that is blasphemy and plain idiotic. You must not understand what God is if you think he could ever be born as a man and then die. God. Does. Not. Die.
Then you deny the Christ and are proudly damned to your fate.
I fully deny Christ. A man is not my God. My God is Yahaweh. In him I trust and in him I take refuge. I worship him and only him. He is my rock and he is my salvation.
>I fully deny Christ.
So be it then.
Matthew 10:33
But whosoever shall deny me before men, him will I also deny before my Father which is in heaven.
Jesus also said the Messiah is not a Son of David. Why should I believe someone who does not believe in God's own promise to David?
Such was answered satisfactorily by the Christ already in saying thus;
>How then doth David in spirit call him Lord, saying, The Lord said unto my Lord, Sit thou on my right hand, till I make thine enemies thy footstool? If David then call him Lord, how is he his son?
So is the one both and therefore not snared by the trap the pharisees though themselves clever by setting.
He was the one who tried setting a trap to the pharisees, they were just minding their own business when Jesus approach them and asked him who they thought the the Messiah was the son of, to catch them in a gotcha. He was the trickster setting trick questions.
He ignores that the Psalm he is talking about was not talking about the Messiah but about David himself. He just did not understand the scriptures.
Then you have failed to comprehend the teaching for the Christ perceived the need to address that point with them, and they too in the end rejected the truth to their own ultimate damnation which you may in the end share.
The Christ was just a fool.
a fool would believe that.
Isn't this what the worshipers of Baal say to Elijah? Only they use the phonetic sound "Baal" instead of "Yahaweh".
Backwards, this is what Elijah said to the King and Queen of Israel when they demanded that Yahaweh's prophets submitted to Baal, and Elijah refused and was persecuted for 3 years because of it, and lived in hiding being protected by Yah.
Are you a Muslim?
The problem I see is that abstract concepts have no meaning or purpose unless they are related back to our personal experiance. Even if God does not have blood, he still owns the blood, and the blood is his, and he influences the blood. The cross is the infinitely small location where God and the blood "touch". That is where Jesus is. For a moment smaller than a microsecond, God and the blood are one, as God commands the blood. I know I'm not explaining things perfectly, but it's all I have to contribute today.
>Christ means, King of those who wrestle with God. Why would I accept the Chosen Lord of those who spar with God as my god? Of course I deny the anointed code of those who have experiance articulating with God as my god. Why would you assign worth to the natural selection of people who have a deep relationship, and experiance of interactions, with Theos and Elohim?
Mumbo jumbo word soup.
>salvation from the blood of God
I want to be saved from Christianity. How do I do that?
Redefine it as natural selection, and then argue semantics and strawmen. Then, in 2000 years, your children will ask the same question of your creation, and the paradigm will again need to be submerged in living water, and raised from the dead.
Why should I accept an innocent to take the punishments for my transgressions?
Because although the children of the fall are damned justly for the adultery committed by the father of sin they are so beloved that God provided for their salvation the blood of God in the flesh so that as one in Christ they are redeemed for their salvation and ascendance, mandated with glorification of the kingdom of heaven upon the earth established by the blood of God.
DO THESE INDIVIDUALS EVEN THINK BEFORE TYPING THEIR LITTLE QUESTIONS, INPUTTING THE CAPTCHA, AND CLICKING ON THE «POST» BUTTON? OF COURSE, THEY DO NOT.
Isn't the unforgivable sin permanent apostacy, where someone makes it impossible for the spirt enter their heart??
yeah, I thought spiritual blasphemy against Logos itself was the one and only true unforgivable sin?
>all-merciful
Where does it say this? God is the Most Merciful, not all merciful. There are some sins that even when he forgives you he still inflicts punishments for you to atone for it. So that the Anger of God can be appeased and your forgiveness can be justified, then it would be fair to the ones who you caused harm to. Because is also the Most Just and the Most Fair. That is why you must accept when life brings you suffering, you dont know if you were accused of your sins in heaven and God is allowing you to pay for your debt so that you can be redeemed in the day of Judgement. So that a Satan cannot accuse you of the evil you did before God in that day and oppose your salvation.
I was taught in a conservative protestant church the only unforgivable sin is a wife that commits adultery. Once she committed that sin she forever lives as an adulteress. Even if she stays in her marriage and never strays again she remains an adulteress, dies an adulteress and damned to hell.
They didn't read the bible.
the kingdom of heaven will be like ten virgins who took their lamps and went out to meet the bridegroom. What is it like for the virgin who is selected, if she commits adultery after being selected?
They read the bible but interpreted each line and verse to support their belief. It was a full court press mind fricking. Line by line. Here is an example. David, whos married sees another mans wife, wants to frick her so he sends her husband to the front line to be killed. We were taught Bathsheba purposefully tempted and seduced David. Shes a vile adulterous vixen and David a righteous king.
Yeah, it's about forgiveness:
Matthew 6:14-15
King James Version
14 For if ye forgive men their trespasses, your heavenly Father will also forgive you:
15 But if ye forgive not men their trespasses, neither will your Father forgive your trespasses.
Forgiveness is only necessary if something cannot be justified. So god knocks up another mans wife, a virgin no less, and its all good because the kid is gods kid. Now if the bootblack had fricked Mary behind Joes back the bootblack and Mary would be damned.
God can’t save you, if you don’t want it.
If Bill Clinton was in this thread, he would say that it depends on what the meaning of the word "is" is. Then he would wink, and go on with his buisness.
Prepare yourself for my mighty word salad:
This is OC, but you can use it to win any future debate. I give it to you free of charge.
The kingdom of heaven is like the strobe of a disco tech. When the light is on, the dancers are Jesus. When the light is off, God is doing all the other stuff in the universe that God needs to do. The strobe light pulses with infinite speed, so that there is no darkness, and no infidelity. This is how God can be a man, but also, subcontiously, take care of all the other boring shit, like counting to infinity.
In my haste to deliver this amazing revelation, I forgot to address the OP. So, the unforgivable sin is the guy who turns off the strobe light, because he wants to sit in darkness, and subcontiously count to infinity with God. He is a total buzz kill, and clearly does not understand the point of the disco tech.