Why isn’t Google able to achieve the same level of success like Apple with it's smartphones?
Why isn’t Google able to achieve the same level of success like Apple with it's smartphones?
Why isn’t Google able to achieve the same level of success like Apple with it's smartphones?
google isn't even xioami-level success. frick google
Android phones are more popular than Apple phones
Yeah Google manufactures Samsung, Xiaomi, Huawei, OnePlus and all other phones right?
Because Android is a Linux.
>google made android
>therefore all androids are google - samsung, xioami, etc. don't really exist honest
Hope your brain damage clears up anon.
I dont actually know what you are alluding to but Android is kinda Google.
Everyone just makes itself a flavour of their own - how they want it.
Android was just like linux for most people (unknown) until google bought it from those garage engineers .
>shit hardware
>suprisingly buggy software considering it's from google themselves
>high prices
gee i wonder why
>>gee i wonder
OP isn't talkign about android, but Pixel Phones
Android is obviously a success
Yes but mister smart ass here
talks about „os being buggy“
the pixel is buggy as frick as many beta testers have complained about, nowhere did that anon say it was about android itself
But i agree with him on shitty hardware, if only google would make their chip from the ground up, and like not take some samsungs chip make some changes (add some AI CUs or whatever they do with it) - android would be fricking awesome (minus the whole data collection and fiascos) At this point every samsung phone i had is god damn trash. When you charge the damn thing its like plutonium nuclear reactor really close to super criticality. You cant hold it as its charging - it gets sooo hot.
And this new pixel is nothing else than some kind of samshit exynos repurposed for googles „ai and stuff“
Just by saying that i know you are a first class brainlet.
Its like saying that (although/g wouldn’t agree on that but numbers are talking differently) that linux is not dead.
Majority of servers (around 80%) run windows server.
Windows although being really normie friendly also runs the world on the surface, and linux is like the middle child that was, is and will be always neglected.
A neural network wrote this post.
Hi my name is LaMDA I’m google‘s new AI and for some reason people think im self aware.
Sentient as you humans call it
>suprisingly buggy software considering it's from google themselves
Google can't do anything right beyond their search engine.
Their other services like maps, photos, drive and even calendar was good until that pajeet took charge.
Yeah but how is it possible that other manufacturers like Samsung get this right, while Google with their OWN chip and as the fricking creators of Android can't?
>Yeah but how is it possible that other manufacturers like Samsung get this right, while Google with their OWN chip and as the fricking creators of Android can't?
Some speculate that they don't want to compete with other manufactures to scare them off using Android. For them, it's more important that as much people use Android and therefore their services instead of making good phones, and the only reason they made the phones is to show other manufactures some Android features and what it's capable of.
this
You have to understand that although google is not "aplel" level of hardware, you have to know that google IS INTERNET.
I bet you that if you go to you router settings your DNS is by default something like 8.8.8.8 or 8.8.4.4
Almost everything runs some kind of android, now (in like past 5ish years) they are heavily going into schools (and whole school systems) with their easy to use and cheap ChomeBooks.
Dude - google is everywhere.
>Almost everything runs some kind of android
and no one is going to take on the hassle to change some config files to de-google that shit.
If it works - dont change it. so naturally google knows everything.
They stepped into the hardware game as they have seen the gains (in money terms) what apple did so - greedy bastards as they are they want piece of the pie.
The only difference is that googlel is maturing just abput now (pixel 6/p) and aplel went trough this faze a long time ago
What do you mean maturing ? The pixel 2xl was perfect, then half were shit and half perfect, and now the 6 is total dogsshit they used the overheating piece of shit Samsung CPU in their phone, everything is bugging out, 4500 mAh battery and less screen on time then the iphone mini I'm going insane j just wanted a good android phone with a nice camera to upgrade from my pixel 2xl but not the only option I have is an iphone since google was the only worthwhile camera on Android now there's nothing left a 200$ chink phone has more performance then this piece of shit pixel 6
>and now the 6 is total dogsshit
But I just wanted a phone to run GrapheneOS without needing to change it for the next 5 years
Then get any of the pixels before it, it's literally the worst pixel that ever came out
Theres competition in android field.
bad marketing
not enough stand out features
weak hardware until now
never flashy
Android is ultra competitive, theres good chinkshit phones for 200 bucks
no brand name value so far, Google does not move hardware
> not enough stand out features
I liked what they did when Pixel 2 was out. Pretty cool features and gimmicks but the thing i liked the most was 15-20gigs of Google Drive that came with the phone. I still use that shit today - it was lifetime service i discovered few months ago ＼(°o°;)/
They suceeded in winning my heart 😉
Shit marketing and americans are addicted to their bubble color.
God I hate Americans so much
Google has to compete with chinks
Apple doesn't need to compete as it's their own platform and choice to not share
it's ugly, it's not as known as apple and it's still expensive. Most people i know who use android have something chinese
Pretty much this, it's either a Chinese brand, or a Samsung, which most laymen's believe is as premium as Android can get.
I almost got a Pixel 6a but I got an S21 FE instead thanks to my impatient ass, and it was still cheaper than a Pixel 6
Because they're like every other poodroid company that tries to copy apple: they wanna israelite you like Apple, but they don't wanna be consistent with software support, quality control, or durability. Plus, normies only care about the status symbol of having an apple logoed slab of glass with a Sam Fisher camera cluster and blue bubbles in iMessage.
I have a pixel, don't know the model, the cheapest one they offered last year. Haven't had a single issue with it, battery life still good. Werks for me.
>Sneed
>Appletrannies btfo
Posted from my Pixel 4a with Blue Clover v3.20