Why isn't their "ecosystem" model illegal? Shouldn't selling a product that only works if you buy another product from the same company be a crime? Shouldn't holding people's personal data inside an unnecessary ecosystem be a crime? Isn't it anticompetitive to force people to buy a product that isn't really even all that great on its own just because they already bought all your other stuff?
 |
 |
|
Uhm, why should it be illegal? Just don't buy Apple products then
>holding people's data hostage shouldn't be illegal
>anticompetitive behavior shouldn't be illegal
>forcing people to buy substandard products simply because they bought other substandard products shouldn't be illegal
the state of mactoddlers.
GOVERN ME HARDER
>yes daddy keep enslaving me and fricking me over with zero accountability i'm your obedient little b***h
Nobody is forcing you to buy Apple shit you government boot licker moron
No one forced you to buy from Apple in the first place.
It's okay if a company refuses to support some stuff. What should be illegal is withholding source code and intentionally hindering interoperability.
They are going to keep doing it as long as morons keep buying their products.
This. Nobody is forcing anyone to buy fricking Apple products. You're annoyed by Apple? Then don't buy their products. Asking government to ban more shit is moronic. Regulations suck and do not work. See: Google monopoly
> Shouldn't selling a product that only works if you buy another product from the same company
many people only own iphone or only own macbook what exactly are you talking about.