Why the frick does this format exist? And why doesn't it work with anything?
 CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
 Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
Why the frick does this format exist? And why doesn't it work with anything?
Why the frick does this format exist? And why doesn't it work with anything?
CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
What do you mean? Every major browser supports it, Photoshop supports it, Affinity Photo supports it, GIMP supports it, Krita supports it, even Blender and Godot support it.
https://caniuse.com/webp
https://helpx.adobe.com/photoshop/kb/support-webp-image-format.html
https://docs.blender.org/manual/en/latest/files/media/image_formats.html
https://docs.godotengine.org/en/stable/tutorials/assets_pipeline/importing_images.html
Why do zoomers get filtered by extensions?
>DUUUUUUDE just render lossy images as bitmaps that'll show them lmao
low iq
high iq
it's a shit format designed by israelitegle to save a few shekels. dont let zog win, use the white man's jpegxl instead
>use the white man's jpegxl instead
IQfy doesn't support that either.
still using webp because it actually works
Literally everything supports it except this site.
Even Firefox gave up on that format.
JXL is fricking slow as frick, stop shilling this garbage format. No i don't care about your fake benchmarks.
>It's fake when it goes against my narrative
Cope.
>Why the frick does this format exist?
They wanted to make very shitty tiny images viewable to save money.
Also it sometimes works significantly better than jpg if you're compressing from pristine quality photos to webp. A good photo is actually quite a bit smaller. But only really for jpg, not jxl
Even my fricking low midrange chinaphone can handle it, there should be no reasonably modern laptop or desktop that struggles with decoding. On these I literally can't tell the image format is more modern from viewing speed.
JXL is really fast... What the frick are you on about? WebP is the slow one. It's VERY slow for an image format.
Source? If there's any image format in desperate need of hardware acceleration it would be jpeg xl, specifically the progressive variant.
>irrelevant graph with irrelevant units that can't even be looked up
>higher is better
That's all you need to understand you smooth brain.
no it isn't, tell me when was the last time you needed to display 64MP/s whatever that means
You quite literally never hit even the threshold for noticing the slowest algorithm being "slow".
Now show hardware accelerated AVIF encoding.
I don't think any normal AVIF encoder supports hardware AV1 encoding, not to mention that it'd most likely not be worth it, since you could get better quality from JPEG. Hardware encoders are mainly meant to be used for real-time video streaming at expense of quality, nothing else.
>use israelitegles format instead of israelitegles format
ok daiz
WebP is from Google.
AVIF is from Alliance for Open Media.
JPEG XL is from ISO/IEC Joint Technical Committee 1 Subcommittee 29 Working Group 1 (aka JPEG).
All 3 are widely influenced by Google
It has 30 percent smaller file size than jpeg, which matters a lot for server costs.
JPEG doesn't support transparency support and PNG's encoding is inefficient for high-res photos.
It's pretty hard to keep this transparent 4096x4096 cube under IQfy's 4MB upload limit as a PNG:
https://litter.catbox.moe/biozys.webp
If JPEG had transparency support that would be really great.
it does
buy better hardware, troony, my literal celeron can decode jxl just fine
>it does
It don't thoughever
works on my machine
Post that transparent jpeg on IQfy (formerly: IQfy)
I tried to but then 4cuck was like "this superior image formt is not supported on this shitty nigerian webshitter forum"
I haven't encountered a single standard JPEG image I could not upload to IQfy (now IQfy). It seems like you're not telling the whole story here.
it''s ok one day you will understand
because he loves when I artificially force png into worst compression mode with some grain to make it exactly 4MiB as he loves when I upload maximum amount of data possible despite 64KiB webp sufficing
What was wrong with PNG? It does everything.
it doesn't compress
Why does that matter when everyone has super fast internet now and every website loads 10 MB of JavaShit bloatware
why are you moronic?
No hardware acceleration. Anyone that actually cares about technology is waiting for AVIF hardware acceleration to become widespread before moving onto that especially since it's interchangeable with AV1.
[5.1/H-1-17] MUST have at least 1 hardware image decoder supporting AVIF Baseline Profile.
https://source.android.com/docs/compatibility/14/android-14-cdd
Why the frick does IQfy still not support it anyway? What is asiaticmoot doing with all the free money he gets from selling our souls?
4K AVIF image under 100KB for anyone interested. Stuff like this would become the norm since that's around the expected file size of AV1 keyframes. Guess what AVIF images are?
https://files.catbox.moe/ycknht.avif
No hardware acceleration unlike AVIF.
https://files.catbox.moe/ycknht.avif
Maybe they don't have any real developers and they'd have to pay someone to implement it, so they just haven't bothered. Or maybe the stack is really old and doesn't support it.
Why does my Applel device think the webp that I download are always videos? It sourts these webp with my MP4s.
see
Webp could have theoretically done something similar with VP8 video. The latter never caught on though.
>Why the frick does this format exist?
Google wants to put its technologies everywhere, no other reasons. They killed jpegXL just to force their solution
Why would anyone bother with flif 2.0?
>his filepicker doesn't automatically convert webp to a compatible format for him
I don't even notice if an image is webp. I just click open file and it converts and uploads to IQfy without me having to do anything
demoralization, first it was Pinterest fricking your image searches and stealing high quality pictures and compressing them for Whatsapp bitstarved mobile view, now this
Your web browser can tell websites it doesn't support webp so the web servers will instead serve you a png/jpg in higher quality, at the "cost" of increased bandwidth.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/dont-accept-webp/?utm_source=addons.mozilla.org
Thanks anon, will install.
everybody would like it if IQfy just supported uploading with it
That would improve the situation but it wouldn't be as good as websites just ditching the stupid format.