Assuming it's because they were descended largely from an already advanced group of peoples. If they were let's say half Minoan or Minoan-like, half of their ancestry came from cultures that had had time to run some IQ amplifying programs (ie economies that reward intelligence and abstract thinking). Anywhere this has happened and where smart people are encouraged to marry each other, you'll see IQ volume levels turned up.
Another hunch is, women, including very smart women, aren't necessarily attracted to very smart guys on a hunter gatherer limbic whatever level. They're attracted to the status this trait comes packaged with in economies that value high intelligence. Without that status they're still more likely to go for other kinds of guys on average.
To groups of people but not necessarily to individuals. I'd bet those studies that have found that intelligent people are seen as better looking on average are the product of culture than anything. Women probably aren't attracted to dumb men (relative to the other people around in their life) but aren't necessarily keen on the 1 guy around who's much smarter than the rest. Super smart women are probably what ignited IQ booms in pre-civilization cultures. Making all of this up as I go.
>J2 were the morons and slaves,
J2 was later post-palesgian intrusion of churka conquerors. They raped mixed steppoids/EEF and had high CHG anf Iran_N.
Nope. J were slaves. They were and are slaves save for the caucasians.
The J2 in Mycenaean burials are directly descended from Minoan J2, and had been in Europe since at least the early Neolithic. So both of your weird rapist theories are fake and gay.
[...]
No, almost all mycenaeans from OPs image are J2.
J2 were smart and built the first euro civilization.
t. R1b
Nope. J were moron slaves and all the intelligent Mycenaeans were descended from IE men.
What do you expect from the type that went to the moon vs the type that invented the trading post religion?
1 month ago
Anonymous
Source?
My ass
1 month ago
Anonymous
Again, most mycenaeans in OP pic are J2 and they are superior to everyone else.
Yes later we are surpassed them, although J2ews are still relevant.
In ancient world J2 totally dominated others in intellectual fields.
1 month ago
Anonymous
[...]
Nope. J were moron slaves and all the intelligent Mycenaeans were descended from IE men.
What do you expect from the type that went to the moon vs the type that invented the trading post religion?
And... yeah.
I won and u lost
1 month ago
Anonymous
Mindlessly repeating something doesn't make it true.
Imperial Italy with the high MENA admixture is the second highest in IQ. Looks like modern Sicilians became less intelligent after the Berber occupation and rape despite having less overall mena admixture than imperial romans. Who had less nafri but more levantine admixture.
Imperial Italy with the high MENA admixture is the second highest in IQ. Looks like modern Sicilians became less intelligent after the Berber occupation and rape despite having less overall mena admixture than imperial romans. Who had less nafri but more levantine admixture.
And Arabs also became less intelligent due to mixing with west africans female Black sex slaves
Med BVLLS. They had the genius and ingenuity, and nutritional surplus of farmers and the ooga booga paleBlack person war drive of steppe people (though significantly higher farmer). This, alongside the terrain and proximity to cultures of the near east allowed them to flourish. Their deeds in war and culture created Greek mythology, which inspired the later classical era which built the West.
Those are pathetic scores though. as for the same study, there is virtually no variation and its a retroactive prediction lmao , compared to height for instance, where the variation is enormous, that variation is hilariously low and its basically elite mycenaean samples vs peasantry from the rest of everything
I legitimately wonder where you even get that elite stuff from, lol. There are maybe two actual Mycenean/Minoan elites in this dataset. Also, I kind of doubt those bronze age elites (basically just warriors, kings and so on) were the smartest ones in the community. It's not like we're talking about modern capitalist society. Back then people became elites because they were good at smashing heads, not because they were intelligent.
Assuming it's because they were descended largely from an already advanced group of peoples. If they were let's say half Minoan or Minoan-like, half of their ancestry came from cultures that had had time to run some IQ amplifying programs (ie economies that reward intelligence and abstract thinking). Anywhere this has happened and where smart people are encouraged to marry each other, you'll see IQ volume levels turned up.
Another hunch is, women, including very smart women, aren't necessarily attracted to very smart guys on a hunter gatherer limbic whatever level. They're attracted to the status this trait comes packaged with in economies that value high intelligence. Without that status they're still more likely to go for other kinds of guys on average.
Intelligence is necessary to plan raiding parties and design functional tools, so intelligence is inherently attractive.
To groups of people but not necessarily to individuals. I'd bet those studies that have found that intelligent people are seen as better looking on average are the product of culture than anything. Women probably aren't attracted to dumb men (relative to the other people around in their life) but aren't necessarily keen on the 1 guy around who's much smarter than the rest. Super smart women are probably what ignited IQ booms in pre-civilization cultures. Making all of this up as I go.
J2 minoan-pelasgian origin
J2 were the morons and slaves, even the Griffin warrior burial was revisited and the J2 guy was found to be a slave buried alongside his R1b master.
>J2 were the morons and slaves,
J2 was later post-palesgian intrusion of churka conquerors. They raped mixed steppoids/EEF and had high CHG anf Iran_N.
Nope. J were slaves. They were and are slaves save for the caucasians.
No, almost all mycenaeans from OPs image are J2.
J2 were smart and built the first euro civilization.
t. R1b
The J2 in Mycenaean burials are directly descended from Minoan J2, and had been in Europe since at least the early Neolithic. So both of your weird rapist theories are fake and gay.
Nope. J were moron slaves and all the intelligent Mycenaeans were descended from IE men.
What do you expect from the type that went to the moon vs the type that invented the trading post religion?
Source?
My ass
Again, most mycenaeans in OP pic are J2 and they are superior to everyone else.
Yes later we are surpassed them, although J2ews are still relevant.
In ancient world J2 totally dominated others in intellectual fields.
And... yeah.
I won and u lost
Mindlessly repeating something doesn't make it true.
>Source: varg told me in a dream
>Why were Myceneans so good?
EEF creators of civilization. What study is this IQ graph from?
Emil Kierkegaard's latest iirc. I know he started as a hack but he is turning out to be more legit.
Imperial Italy with the high MENA admixture is the second highest in IQ. Looks like modern Sicilians became less intelligent after the Berber occupation and rape despite having less overall mena admixture than imperial romans. Who had less nafri but more levantine admixture.
Also Arabs become less intelligent since roman times due to inbreeding. Looks like they were more intelligent than Europeans originally
And Arabs also became less intelligent due to mixing with west africans female Black sex slaves
That's Iron Age Italy.
>Looks like modern Sicilians became less intelligent after the Berber occupation and rape despite
Stoehengechads stay winning
>BA Greece
>N Middle East
>Imperial Italy
explains a lot
Med BVLLS. They had the genius and ingenuity, and nutritional surplus of farmers and the ooga booga paleBlack person war drive of steppe people (though significantly higher farmer). This, alongside the terrain and proximity to cultures of the near east allowed them to flourish. Their deeds in war and culture created Greek mythology, which inspired the later classical era which built the West.
Those are pathetic scores though. as for the same study, there is virtually no variation and its a retroactive prediction lmao , compared to height for instance, where the variation is enormous, that variation is hilariously low and its basically elite mycenaean samples vs peasantry from the rest of everything
Height and IQ arent even remotely comparable
I legitimately wonder where you even get that elite stuff from, lol. There are maybe two actual Mycenean/Minoan elites in this dataset. Also, I kind of doubt those bronze age elites (basically just warriors, kings and so on) were the smartest ones in the community. It's not like we're talking about modern capitalist society. Back then people became elites because they were good at smashing heads, not because they were intelligent.