What's the point? >Completely uninhabitable to people, unless they construct extremely sturdy structures to live in, probably underground thus rendering the concept of living on another planet moot >Dust storms that literally tear you apart >Radiation beyond survivable levels, you will get cancer, no treatment available >No return home possible >Lower gravity will cause osteoporosis / other health concerns >Can't even escape to much of the Earth internet with such high bandwidth
The only reason billionaires want to go to mars, is to claim it as theirs and mine it of its resources. All other reasons are raw propaganda.
>Completely uninhabitable to people, unless they construct extremely sturdy structures to live in, probably underground thus rendering the concept of living on another planet moot
https://caseyhandmer.wordpress.com/2019/11/28/domes-are-very-over-rated/ >Dust storms that literally tear you apart
Completely false, dust storms are like a soft breeze because the atmosphere is so thin. The only issue is obscuring the sky for solar power.
https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/the-fact-and-fiction-of-martian-dust-storms >Radiation beyond survivable levels, you will get cancer, no treatment available
Completely false, picrel is the (unshielded!) radiation dose, twice the very conservative limit for nuclear workers. If you were to only sleep in a shielded area and otherwise run around naked in the vacuum, you'd be below the limit. >No return home possible
Completely untrue, see https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20170007818/downloads/20170007818.pdf?attachment=true >Lower gravity will cause osteoporosis / other health concerns
One of the biggest concerns, there has been zero research to prove or disprove damage occuring even with exercise because the longest people have stayed in partial-g is Apollo.
Elon-writer, I'm sorry you are paid so little in your home country. This globalist world can be brutal. Have you considered roofing houses instead?
YWNGTM
>Thinks billionaires no.1 priority isn't to become unimaginably rich.
What a loser. You down play hazards like you're on a payroll by musk. Low gravity , blehhh no worry. Radiation???? Shielded. No worry. Ah ok so these people live in a fricking lead tomb. Fuuuuun.
Thanks for this list.
I will just point out that the radiation dose in your graph is coming from the cosmos, and does not consider the radiation from Mars itself. If Martian colonists are settling lava-domes, they are settling basalt which we may expect to be high in radon. We may also suspect that radon ingestion will mix with weakened bodily structure due to low Mars gravity.
>probably underground thus rendering the concept of living on another planet moot
Why would this render living on another planet moot?
Underground or not you're still on another planet.
Dust storms that literally tear you apart
Stop watching movies, the strongest winds on mars are less powerful than a desk fan. >Radiation beyond survivable levels, you will get cancer, no treatment available
Which is why you would ideally want your base under ground, although even a few millimeters of aluminum hull covered in a couple of additional millimeters of regolith would lower radiation exposure dramatically. >No return home possible
Not sure where you're getting this idea from, it would not only be possible but easier than the process of getting there due to lower surface gravity and less atmosphere. >Lower gravity will cause osteoporosis / other health concerns
Over time yes, which is why the first few generations of astronauts there would be cycled back to earth for study on how martian gravity affected them. As of right now there is only studies of prolonged exposure to earth gravity and microgravity on the ISS but nothing in regards to .33G, it may be possible to counteract the effects via drugs and/or strenuous exercise. >Can't even escape to much of the Earth internet with such high bandwidth
Presumably astronauts would be taking all the movies/books/games/etc they want on HDDs before making the trip.
That said communication would still be possible just with a delay. >The only reason billionaires want to go to mars, is to claim it as theirs and mine it of its resources.
Resources on mars would not be worth it economically to ship back to earth, there is very little to gain in the short term (short term here being within the lifespans of said billionaires) outside of alternate uses that the technology to go to mars would provide on earth (starship being used for transporting cargo/people rapidly across earth.)
>2022
If FAA gives green light, they can start launching rockets >2024
Possible mars launch window for initial cargo mission >2026
Human mission or more cargo missions, just to verify newer changes >2029
Human launches
Currently it all hinges upon FAA approval, which has been delayed by nearly half a year.
Possible yes, but not people just scientific instruments, rovers, maybe a few robots, and supplies for future visits.
Humans exploration of mars is 2030s thing, not a 2020s thing.
2022
2021
>the past
Spotted the brainlet.
without the moronic windows, maybe
>Musk timeline
better add a decade or two to it
nope because
>space is empty goy
>focus on ABCD+ goy
>PutYourMaskOn goy
> why yes I am a schizo how could you tell
meds
What's the point?
>Completely uninhabitable to people, unless they construct extremely sturdy structures to live in, probably underground thus rendering the concept of living on another planet moot
>Dust storms that literally tear you apart
>Radiation beyond survivable levels, you will get cancer, no treatment available
>No return home possible
>Lower gravity will cause osteoporosis / other health concerns
>Can't even escape to much of the Earth internet with such high bandwidth
The only reason billionaires want to go to mars, is to claim it as theirs and mine it of its resources. All other reasons are raw propaganda.
>Completely uninhabitable to people, unless they construct extremely sturdy structures to live in, probably underground thus rendering the concept of living on another planet moot
https://caseyhandmer.wordpress.com/2019/11/28/domes-are-very-over-rated/
>Dust storms that literally tear you apart
Completely false, dust storms are like a soft breeze because the atmosphere is so thin. The only issue is obscuring the sky for solar power.
https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/the-fact-and-fiction-of-martian-dust-storms
>Radiation beyond survivable levels, you will get cancer, no treatment available
Completely false, picrel is the (unshielded!) radiation dose, twice the very conservative limit for nuclear workers. If you were to only sleep in a shielded area and otherwise run around naked in the vacuum, you'd be below the limit.
>No return home possible
Completely untrue, see https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20170007818/downloads/20170007818.pdf?attachment=true
>Lower gravity will cause osteoporosis / other health concerns
One of the biggest concerns, there has been zero research to prove or disprove damage occuring even with exercise because the longest people have stayed in partial-g is Apollo.
pic
Elon-writer, I'm sorry you are paid so little in your home country. This globalist world can be brutal. Have you considered roofing houses instead?
YWNGTM
>pretends to have a point
>doesn't actually
>Thinks billionaires no.1 priority isn't to become unimaginably rich.
What a loser. You down play hazards like you're on a payroll by musk. Low gravity , blehhh no worry. Radiation???? Shielded. No worry. Ah ok so these people live in a fricking lead tomb. Fuuuuun.
homosexual.
Go play star trek on a busy road please.
Thanks for this list.
I will just point out that the radiation dose in your graph is coming from the cosmos, and does not consider the radiation from Mars itself. If Martian colonists are settling lava-domes, they are settling basalt which we may expect to be high in radon. We may also suspect that radon ingestion will mix with weakened bodily structure due to low Mars gravity.
Do we have even a wild guess as to how much radiation comes from Mars itself?
He got his start as a software developer so you should always at least triple any time estimate.
>He got his start as a software developer so you should always at least triple any time estimate.
Unless I'm missing something, his "software development" was all about buying software development teams and telling them what he wanted.
>Unless I'm missing something,
You are but I'm sure this isn't the first time you've posted something stupid and wrong.
I like how your detractors failed to refute your claims and instead proceeded to call you a shill.
Why would I argue with someone picking their boogers right in front of me? His "list" is demonstrably false to anyone with half a brain
>probably underground thus rendering the concept of living on another planet moot
lol
>probably underground thus rendering the concept of living on another planet moot
Why would this render living on another planet moot?
Underground or not you're still on another planet.
Dust storms that literally tear you apart
Stop watching movies, the strongest winds on mars are less powerful than a desk fan.
>Radiation beyond survivable levels, you will get cancer, no treatment available
Which is why you would ideally want your base under ground, although even a few millimeters of aluminum hull covered in a couple of additional millimeters of regolith would lower radiation exposure dramatically.
>No return home possible
Not sure where you're getting this idea from, it would not only be possible but easier than the process of getting there due to lower surface gravity and less atmosphere.
>Lower gravity will cause osteoporosis / other health concerns
Over time yes, which is why the first few generations of astronauts there would be cycled back to earth for study on how martian gravity affected them. As of right now there is only studies of prolonged exposure to earth gravity and microgravity on the ISS but nothing in regards to .33G, it may be possible to counteract the effects via drugs and/or strenuous exercise.
>Can't even escape to much of the Earth internet with such high bandwidth
Presumably astronauts would be taking all the movies/books/games/etc they want on HDDs before making the trip.
That said communication would still be possible just with a delay.
>The only reason billionaires want to go to mars, is to claim it as theirs and mine it of its resources.
Resources on mars would not be worth it economically to ship back to earth, there is very little to gain in the short term (short term here being within the lifespans of said billionaires) outside of alternate uses that the technology to go to mars would provide on earth (starship being used for transporting cargo/people rapidly across earth.)
a flying dildo? Who knows.
>2022
If FAA gives green light, they can start launching rockets
>2024
Possible mars launch window for initial cargo mission
>2026
Human mission or more cargo missions, just to verify newer changes
>2029
Human launches
Currently it all hinges upon FAA approval, which has been delayed by nearly half a year.
>we're all waiting on the govt regulators to finish their 6 month inspection
I fricking hate the FAA
>Will it be possible in 2026?
Possible yes, but not people just scientific instruments, rovers, maybe a few robots, and supplies for future visits.
Humans exploration of mars is 2030s thing, not a 2020s thing.
In 2620
If physics doesn't disallow it then it's possible.
Will it happen?
No.
why is she so excited about those cruddy sweets, she could be off picking pokemon creatures.