Will we be looking at him in 100 years just like we look at Napoleon now?

Will we be looking at him in 100 years just like we look at Napoleon now?

POSIWID: The Purpose Of A System Is What It Does Shirt $21.68

Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68

POSIWID: The Purpose Of A System Is What It Does Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    AmeriKKKan empire is built over the myth they defeated him, as long burgers stay at power they need to demonize him to maintain their own narrative.

  2. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Not until the holohoax story gets dismantled.

  3. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    There's a difference between the French Revolution and its impact and the modern world which is built on the ashes of Hitler's project. But I think the historical memory in 100 years will be more down to the Chinese and Indians to determine which would probably benefit Stalin in the case of the Chinese, but Hitler's reputation would probably become less taboo as well if India is any indication. But it could also get wacky as a lot of the Indians who actually like Hitler and think he was a great man are the same people who claim israelites and Israelis as their brothers lol

    Which is why it's bizarrely funny when some Hindutva guy with a Hitler avatar on Twitter replies to an Israeli account and is like "sir, please sir, you lead and we follow, god bless you sir" and the Israeli guy is like "gahh! get off my balls you savages!"

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous
    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Tensions with Muslims are more important politically than anything else for most Indians. The thought process is literally “Israel = anti-Muslim = good guys”.

  4. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    A lot of people in 2022 are still seething mad at Nappy

  5. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    no, and you know exactly why

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >baby
      oh yeah the killing babies and burning their bodies, good point.

  6. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    It's arguable whether we'll even be alive as a species in 100 years

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >It's arguable whether we'll even be alive as a *significant* species in 100 years

      There will be a million or so world wide darting in and out of old tunnels and sewers.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Even if a full-on nuclear exchange occurred, I'm pretty sure South America would be basically untouched by the conflict and Brazil would come out the most developed nation in the world (that's left)

  7. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Ιf we win, then yes

  8. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    No he will probably be viewed even worse in 100 years LMAO XDDDDD

  9. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Nope. Napoleon actually innovated, and even though he lost, he left important legacies in both military theory and civil law. Hitler just had a gigantic spergout and was put down like the mad dog he was. He's not going to be rehabilitated because there's nothing admirable to rehabilitate.

  10. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I could see him becoming like the Stalin for Germans eventually. A harsh historical figure who killed a lot of people but got things done and whose regime and ideology had some unique positive points.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      That's the view of a surprising number of Americans. NASA (and the rocket needy military) immediately took a liking to relevant scientists.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Yeah I believe underneath America's fixation on him and the nazis is an unconscious respect of him for a lot of people. This is likely caused by our corrupt and failed political system and the drastic ethnic and cultural transformations that have plagued America and have sped up as time goes by which Hitler stands in stark contrast to.

  11. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    As long as israeli people exist, Hitler will not be viewed as Napoleon.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Just the opposite: they have deepened the impact of his name to such a degree that he will become known eternally as an insanely powerful figure, the most powerful in history, as a result of their Satanizing.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        He lost the war and killed himself.

  12. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >incoherent neo nazi propaganda spergout
    why are these subhumans even tolerated on a history board? they clearly lack the mental capacity needed to actually care about/learn history.

  13. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    you wish, hitlertard

  14. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    he would be looked at like a savage high on meth and bull testicles that led to the utter destruction of Europe.

  15. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    you will never have a federation of earth

  16. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    No, and the comparison is a stupid one. Napoleon was never considered a devil in the same way Hitler is. A lot of people hated him, but there was also open admiration of him even in enemy countries. Hegel described him as the "world-soul on horseback," and some Francophilic Americans even named their children after him. His body was greeted by cheering crowds when it was returned to France, and the strength of his memory was enough to bring his nephew to power. Tellingly, nobody in Europe seemed to regard the crowning of Napoleon III as the new Emperor of the French in an explicit revival of Napoleon's empire as an evil or distressing thing (some socialist revolutionaries notwithstanding). All of this is unthinkable for Hitler.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *