Wolfe "fans" do not understand Wolfe's intent with BotNS, nor its most important theme, nor its message, nor can they defend him agains...

Wolfe "fans" do not understand Wolfe's intent with BotNS, nor its most important theme, nor its message, nor can they defend him against legit lit metrics, which is why they will always be in the ghetto of real literature.

CRIME Shirt $21.68

Unattended Children Pitbull Club Shirt $21.68

CRIME Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    you just want a wolfe thread but this isn't IQfy, you can just say you like wolfe and post about something of his you read recently

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      No I want Wolfetards to remember how terrible they are. They don't get Wolfe beyond the superficial and can't defend him, despite Wolfe being legit good. I've never seen a Wolfe fan smart enough to successfully defend him on all ends.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        ok

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Example: You haven't even attempted so, even though I stated I realize Wolfe is good. In fact, I've never seen a Wolfe fan successfully defend him.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            What makes you think I want to vindicate myself or an author I like to you? Do you think yourself so interesting that I should bother?

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Not to me per se.

            That you even consider me a factor in this shows your love for Wolfe isn't great enough to surmount it, making your enthusiasm for him mid. It also shows you aren't confident enough in Wolfe or yourself to pull it off. You are a coward.

            Wolfe fans should be representing him on his terms alone, for the sake of Wolfe, his works, criticism for him, and his fans. But there are no successful examples of this.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            I concur with the other anon who replied to you and add that you're also incredibly boring.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            I concur with the other anon who replied to you and add that you're also incredibly boring.

            Limp/10, still not impressed by IQfy Wolfe fans.

            I have met a decent Wolfe fan in Discord who indeed is able to describe why he's good on multiple ends. He is the reason I realized Wolfe is legit good.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            sounds gay

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            You sound miserable.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Here's a (You) buddy.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Reading is a purely social art borne of a society’s need to vindicate its own experience of the world by erecting these monuments to it that can be heralded as objectively worthy. This is why people love to speculate about what might constitute a country’s defining work. In this sense, articulating the value of something is useless, as a book’s worth is measured in its many believers, not the quality of their discourse.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      No I want Wolfetards to remember how terrible they are. They don't get Wolfe beyond the superficial and can't defend him, despite Wolfe being legit good. I've never seen a Wolfe fan smart enough to successfully defend him on all ends.

      He has a cool name

      We go through this every couple of years. There was a time when IQfy was the best place for legit Wolfe discussion apart from the URTH list. You're a newbie and haven't been around here long enough to make this accusation credibly. Shit we used to have entire threads dedicated to Wolfe almost daily here.

      I've been here for ages and know more about Wolfe than anyone here. Ask me a question about a section from BotNS and I will probably be able to answer it. I checked Wolfe threads on occasion but it was either irrelevant or people dunking on Wolfe and Wolfe "fans" being unable to explain why Wolfe is good.

      >Overall, I found nothing unique in Wolfe. Perhaps it's because I've read quite a bit of odd fantasy; if all I read was mainstream stuff, then I'd surely find Wolfe unpredictable, since he is a step above them. But compared to Leiber, Howard, Dunsany, Eddison, Kipling, Haggard, Peake, Mieville, or Moorwiener, Wolfe is nothing special.
      >Perhaps I just got my hopes up too high. I imagined something that might evoke Peake or Leiber (at his best), perhaps with a complexity and depth gesturing toward Milton or Ariosto. I could hardly imagine a better book than that, but even a book half that good would be a delight--or a book that was nothing like that, but was unpredictable and seductive in some other way.
      >I kept waiting for something to happen, but it never really did. It all plods along without much rise or fall, just the constant moving action to make us think something interesting is happening. I did find some promise, some moments that I would have loved to see the author explore, particularly those odd moments where Silver Age Sci Fi crept in, but each time he touched upon these, he would return immediately to the smallness of his plot and his annoying prick of a narrator. I never found the book to be difficult or complex, merely tiring. the unusual parts were evasive and vague, and the dull parts constant and repetitive.
      >The whole structure (or lack of it) does leave things up to interpretation, and perhaps that's what some readers find appealing: that they can superimpose their own thoughts and values onto the narrator, and onto the plot itself. But at that point, they don't like the book Wolfe wrote, they like the book they are writing between his lines.
      Wolfebros...

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        OP here. Keely is a midwit homosexual and a jawlet who doesn't look like his avatar.

        >never found the book to be difficult or complex
        This is bullshit. BotNS's style is ornate and difficult. Keely most certainly doesn't know all the words used.

        >the unusual parts were evasive and vague
        Most readers make this mistake, but Keely is a known critic, and to make peremptory judgments despite knowing Wolfe was praised by Asimov and LeGuin is very, very stupid.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        OP here. Keely is a midwit homosexual and a jawlet who doesn't look like his avatar.

        >never found the book to be difficult or complex
        This is bullshit. BotNS's style is ornate and difficult. Keely most certainly doesn't know all the words used.

        >the unusual parts were evasive and vague
        Most readers make this mistake, but Keely is a known critic, and to make peremptory judgments despite knowing Wolfe was praised by Asimov and LeGuin is very, very stupid.

        You now remember the time Keely tried to shitpost about Wolfe here and got BTFO.

        https://warosu.org/lit/thread/S4926349#p4940019

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          The fact that he hasn't revised his criticism since makes me not care he showed up here.

          Moreover IQfy Wolfe detractors are able to point out Wolfe's shortcomings, yet Wolfe fans defend him like Harry Potter landwhales.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >waiting for something to happen, but it never really did

        Defective Subjectivity: the plot gay.

  2. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    He has a cool name

  3. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    We go through this every couple of years. There was a time when IQfy was the best place for legit Wolfe discussion apart from the URTH list. You're a newbie and haven't been around here long enough to make this accusation credibly. Shit we used to have entire threads dedicated to Wolfe almost daily here.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      I've been here for ages and know more about Wolfe than anyone here. Ask me a question about a section from BotNS and I will probably be able to answer it. I checked Wolfe threads on occasion but it was either irrelevant or people dunking on Wolfe and Wolfe "fans" being unable to explain why Wolfe is good.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        But can you talk about Latro?

  4. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    > they can superimpose their own thoughts and values onto the narrator, and onto the plot itself. But at that point, they don't like the book Wolfe wrote, they like the book they are writing between his lines.

    That’s literally how anyone reads anything.

    What a midwit.

  5. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I like soldier of the mist more

  6. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    What's your point?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      That you don't have one. No one can even find a successful Wolfe defender in the lit archive.

  7. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Words, words and no substance.
    OP, try putting in at least a little bit of effort and some of that extra chromosomes you’ve got next time. The thread is devoid of any value whatsoever.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      because its about wolfe

  8. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >real literature
    oh who gives a shit, are you some sort of academic trying to justify adding him to curriculum?

  9. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I've read it and I enjoyed reading it. Felt like LOTR on magic mushrooms

  10. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Wolfe stock tanking as usual. Wolfe's fans are doing their best to make themselves look weak and their alt author as irrelevant as possible.

  11. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I love living in the ghetto of real literature.

  12. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Dan il-post huwa t-tojlit tiegħi issa.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *