no
it takes about three months of daily studying (about 1hr a day) to get through the basics. after this period you can fix your imperfections with enough vocabulary (reading books). only the moronic and the ilitterate take longer than that
it's a whole fricking new alphabet you dumbfrick, of course it's going to take a bit longer. still you can achieve reading comprehension in a matter of months all the same if you practice. frick you
1 month ago
Anonymous
You can learn to read 한굴 in a day if you wanted to, you colossal moron. The 'Alphabet' has nothing to do with Korean difficulty and if you knew anything about the language you'd know that.
The difficult part is the vastly different vocabulary and grammar points, after 100 hours of textbook study, you'd probably have a reading comprehension rate of about 10%, good luck reading any novels with that, dumbfrick frog.
1 month ago
Anonymous
1 month ago
Anonymous
>100 hours
Nobody should expect to learn a language to the point of reading in just 100 hours.
It takes a monolingual anglo an average of 600 hours to hit B1 in French or Spanish. That's 43 weeks at 2hr/day. For Korean, double that: that's 1200 hours, or 86 weeks at the same pace. Realistically, you can read books with a dictionary long before you really. Hit B1, and doing so will even count towards your total hours. Anyway, we're on a website where people sink more hours over the course of fewer weeks into far worse pursuits. To appreciate Baudelaire and Racine is certainly worth such an investment. Not sure about the Koreans tho.
Cervantes, Calderón de la barca, lope de vega, Bécquer, Borges, Gabriel García Márquez, Quevedo, Góngora, Pio Baroja, Ortega y Gasset, Miguel de Unamuno, Pablo Neruda, José Antonio Primo de Rivera, Agustín de Foxa, Antonio Machado, Federico García Lorca.
Learning a language to an advanced degree would take several years with several hours of studying every day. No author is worth this time.
no
it takes about three months of daily studying (about 1hr a day) to get through the basics. after this period you can fix your imperfections with enough vocabulary (reading books). only the moronic and the ilitterate take longer than that
Sure, bro, 100 hours is totally enough to start reading books...
Fricking monolingual morons.
depends what kind of book, a kids book is going to be easier than a philosophy book
yes, you Black person. I speak french english and german
maybe your just stupid
Michel Thomas method and constant input.
how about you stop coping and you git gud, EOP.
What’s wrong with being moronic?
Heavily depends on the language. good luck reading a Chinese or Korean novel as EFL after 100 hours of grammar/basic vocab study moron.
it's a whole fricking new alphabet you dumbfrick, of course it's going to take a bit longer. still you can achieve reading comprehension in a matter of months all the same if you practice. frick you
You can learn to read 한굴 in a day if you wanted to, you colossal moron. The 'Alphabet' has nothing to do with Korean difficulty and if you knew anything about the language you'd know that.
The difficult part is the vastly different vocabulary and grammar points, after 100 hours of textbook study, you'd probably have a reading comprehension rate of about 10%, good luck reading any novels with that, dumbfrick frog.
>100 hours
Nobody should expect to learn a language to the point of reading in just 100 hours.
It takes a monolingual anglo an average of 600 hours to hit B1 in French or Spanish. That's 43 weeks at 2hr/day. For Korean, double that: that's 1200 hours, or 86 weeks at the same pace. Realistically, you can read books with a dictionary long before you really. Hit B1, and doing so will even count towards your total hours. Anyway, we're on a website where people sink more hours over the course of fewer weeks into far worse pursuits. To appreciate Baudelaire and Racine is certainly worth such an investment. Not sure about the Koreans tho.
You are allowed to use a dictionary when you read things. Sometimes I even use one for English!
Jesus, you must be ESL
Proust
yeah I get this sense that French literature doesn't translate well. Saving Proust and Flaubert for when I can read French
Yeah studied French intensely to be able to read e-girlta
Le e-girlta
LA e-girlta you fricking moron
bait
Tamil for the Tirukkural
of the pajeet tongues
sanskrit is more ROI
it's my mother tongue but i've never got the chance to learn to write and read. any steps to learn it now that i am an adult?
Paul, Matthew, Mark, Luke and John, so ancient Greek.
Matthew wrote in Hebrew, but I don’t think enough fragments survived so yeah Matthew
Dante seems to be the only author that people do this for
Plato and Aristotle
I LEARN THE PORTUGUESE FOR SHE.
>I learn Portuguese for her.
FTFY
Why are zoomers incapable of detecting any type of irony, sarcasm or satire?
Cum genius you're supposed to use a trip and talk in all caps
That’s just an autism trait
She is written in English. Unless you're referring to a Portuguese translation.
milton easily
Milton is a hack who just copied some dutch play
moron ALERT
I learned English to read all the posts of you brilliant anons :^)
Native lang?
How hard was it?
What was your method?
Cervantes, Calderón de la barca, lope de vega, Bécquer, Borges, Gabriel García Márquez, Quevedo, Góngora, Pio Baroja, Ortega y Gasset, Miguel de Unamuno, Pablo Neruda, José Antonio Primo de Rivera, Agustín de Foxa, Antonio Machado, Federico García Lorca.
Learn Spanish, NOW.
>Foxa, José Antonio
Joder, cómo estamos hoy.
Heidegger, Hitler, Nietzsche
Kalevala in Finnish.
Unamuno learnt Danish just to read Kierkegaard, but he was a literate linguist and not at all a monolingual idiot, so he had it easier.