and also not sure you realize just how many eclipses happen on Earth, many of which might have coincided with CERN running the beams. it's burger brain disease because it happens on their land this time
literally eclipse science?
humans are so easily spooked by shit it's so funny. cmon bros, that "if everybody is talking about it then there must be something to it" is not applicable here, at most the concept is weaponized for clicks. literally nothing happens. everything that would happen is directly human generated because they are fricking moronic.
i probably should, i'm literally a 30-minute drive from the path of totality, but i'm also in a major city so i'm afraid all the roads leading to that path will be a bumper-to-bumper parking lot. low key hoping for it to be a cloudy day so i don't feel bad for not putting up with all 'at
>There's exactly one sun and exactly one moon for this particular planet and it JUST SO HAPPENS that despite having vastly different diameters and vastly different distances from the earth, their apparent sizes are identical oh and randomly every few years they line up just PERFECTLY in the sky so large numbers of people can see the eclipse safely but only for a few seconds
Whoever programmed this simulation wanted to leave clues so that all but the dumbest would understand it for the simulation that it is.
>credulous rube just goes with it and accepts ridiculous, arbitrary coincidence which he knows to be ridiculous and arbitrary because he knows a little bit about astronomy because... THAT'S JUST HOW IT IS, OKAY?!?!
>credulous dunce pretends to win argument by "maintaining calm" and blissfully goes about his bluepill day, never considering for a moment the astronomically low probability that a planet harboring life just so happens to have one sun and one moon which appear to be the exact same size in the sky
1 month ago
Anonymous
1 month ago
Anonymous
stop filtering yourselves with the anthropic principle.
1 month ago
Anonymous
that's not how the anthropic principle works, unless the fact that the sun and moon have the same apparent size was necessary for our development
1 month ago
Anonymous
>unless the fact that the sun and moon have the same apparent size was necessary for our development
and with a sample size of one, it seems they might be required. moon of that size has a certain mass, and at that distance has a certain effects on water and cycles etc.
1 month ago
Anonymous
Not that anon but your post is just you spraying shit out of your ass. Show some evidence that any of that matters, if so, it would have been studied and postulated
1 month ago
Anonymous
are you fricking moronic? read the link. also I don't really care what you think should have happened by now, that is not a fricking argument you moron
1 month ago
Anonymous
https://www.urmc.rochester.edu/encyclopedia/content.aspx?contenttypeid=6&contentid=1650129872
if we're talking about sentience, seeing the moon similar to sun on skies, you consider all systems where there's at least a moon. now you can only ask yourself "what are the chances that all sentient life which must have a moon sees that moon as similar size as their star", and we go further into mass required to move tides in similar fashion and all that, you might get thereabouts as it is for as, with some small variation. all of a sudden chances are not so low anymore. might be quite high actually
missing info is a b***h to consider
not a burger, don't care
Jelly
seen a full one before tho. experiencing it is interesting ngl
whats the purpose of starting a CERN in Switzerland on te same day as the eclipse happens in USA?
why NASA needds to launch 3 visible rockets in front of the eclipse at the same moment?
I mean it is a Monday
and also not sure you realize just how many eclipses happen on Earth, many of which might have coincided with CERN running the beams. it's burger brain disease because it happens on their land this time
explain the NASA rockets though
literally eclipse science?
humans are so easily spooked by shit it's so funny. cmon bros, that "if everybody is talking about it then there must be something to it" is not applicable here, at most the concept is weaponized for clicks. literally nothing happens. everything that would happen is directly human generated because they are fricking moronic.
They want to nuke Russia, that is why.
Will it wash away the rain?
i probably should, i'm literally a 30-minute drive from the path of totality, but i'm also in a major city so i'm afraid all the roads leading to that path will be a bumper-to-bumper parking lot. low key hoping for it to be a cloudy day so i don't feel bad for not putting up with all 'at
Same. I kind of felt bad about missing this years eclipse but now that I’m seeing almost all of the country is going to be overcast I feel less bad.
LMAO, you gonna get nuked next Monday.
if nukes start flying everybody gets nuked lol
what's the best shithole to be in if that happens?
I am certain some Samoan island is remote enough from all the big population centers
I'm going to Texas, but the forecast isn't good.
what's the best stream to see it online?
>There's exactly one sun and exactly one moon for this particular planet and it JUST SO HAPPENS that despite having vastly different diameters and vastly different distances from the earth, their apparent sizes are identical oh and randomly every few years they line up just PERFECTLY in the sky so large numbers of people can see the eclipse safely but only for a few seconds
Whoever programmed this simulation wanted to leave clues so that all but the dumbest would understand it for the simulation that it is.
>wanted to leave clues
are you sure that isn't your schizophrenia?
>credulous rube just goes with it and accepts ridiculous, arbitrary coincidence which he knows to be ridiculous and arbitrary because he knows a little bit about astronomy because... THAT'S JUST HOW IT IS, OKAY?!?!
oh, so it really is your schizophrenia.
>credulous dunce pretends to win argument by "maintaining calm" and blissfully goes about his bluepill day, never considering for a moment the astronomically low probability that a planet harboring life just so happens to have one sun and one moon which appear to be the exact same size in the sky
stop filtering yourselves with the anthropic principle.
that's not how the anthropic principle works, unless the fact that the sun and moon have the same apparent size was necessary for our development
>unless the fact that the sun and moon have the same apparent size was necessary for our development
and with a sample size of one, it seems they might be required. moon of that size has a certain mass, and at that distance has a certain effects on water and cycles etc.
Not that anon but your post is just you spraying shit out of your ass. Show some evidence that any of that matters, if so, it would have been studied and postulated
are you fricking moronic? read the link. also I don't really care what you think should have happened by now, that is not a fricking argument you moron
https://www.urmc.rochester.edu/encyclopedia/content.aspx?contenttypeid=6&contentid=1650129872
if we're talking about sentience, seeing the moon similar to sun on skies, you consider all systems where there's at least a moon. now you can only ask yourself "what are the chances that all sentient life which must have a moon sees that moon as similar size as their star", and we go further into mass required to move tides in similar fashion and all that, you might get thereabouts as it is for as, with some small variation. all of a sudden chances are not so low anymore. might be quite high actually
missing info is a b***h to consider
No because I'm not a satanist. I'll be praying for you