sex and life aren't the same, I could buy a Black person's life with a handful of salt. That puts their value pretty low as a living creature. You could get more for a pig
2 years ago
Anonymous
>sex and life aren't the same
kek. virgin.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Do you ever get tired of thinking about black people every single second of every single day?
The Southern Baptist Church was intentionally created to soften the religious and moral implications of chattel slavery for one.
A lot of the mindset was that slavery was good for Africans and would civilize them (somehow), but stuff like being born into slavery, multiple generations being enslaved and raised entirely in the US with no connection to African culture, and families being broken up during the sale of slaves posed moral problems that were not lost on even the most ardently pro-slavery people.
What really blows my mind is that Blacks are the most reliable group of Christians lmao. Imagine talking about cultural appropriation and being a cuck to the religion of your oppressor. Humiliating. Irreconcilable. Absolutely embarrassing. That goes for any of you "indio" Mexican Catholics as well.
Slave owners didn't give a shit while the 99% where impoverished yeowmen farmer strivers that couldn't be fricking bothered to care. This is why Whigs could have aaved US and stopped the CW from happening, all they had to do was induatrialize the south, crush slaver power via capitalist power and then end the rotten piece of shit by choking it with the hands of proletarianized yeowmen and crushed with industrial steel.
I'm an Eastern Euro commie who is autistically obsessed with early American history, and what could have been different to prevent the rise of the great satan we see today. Yes, it was the slavers fault, because in early US the yeowman couldn't really vote, it was a beyond fricked political machine that only cared for the aristocratic vote. Yes, of course southerners were more racist, but not pathologically so. My post is more just me shitting on Jeffersonianism, because that is what killed the US from becoming more like Europe - Jeffersonian dream of self sufficient yeowmen farmers, and the autistic hate for centralization that followed it. National banks, infrastructure construction, incentives for capitalist production in the south - that is how US could have been saved.
1.) They used certain Biblical passages to justify slavery
2.) Slavery was often justified as a way to turn pagan or Muslim Africans into Christians, saying "It's for their own good!"
They were not christians, they were mostly animists forced to convert into christianity (and they gained some right through that conversion), but for the owners it was more or less like baptising cattle, they didn't really care.
Many in the South believed (or convinced themselves to believe) that God had created the African to be the slave of the white man, that this was his divine order.
Ironically enough, abolitionism arose from the Second Great Awakening in the North, and abolitionists were generally extremely religious people who believed that slavery was not just a political wrong, but a moral sin.
You saw similar stuff back in the Middle Ages when the Catholic Church had almost complete control of scripture, and priests were able to pick and choose versus that encouraged serfs to believe that this was the divine order of God; that they were peasants because God had intended them to be peasants, that the social order was divinely ordained. This is why it was such a massive deal when Martin Luther translated the Bible into German; it made the Bible accessible to many more people, and they could see all the parts of the Bible that had been conveniently left out of the sermons.
>Many in the South believed (or convinced themselves to believe) that God had created the African to be the slave of the white man
That was one of the things that the Talmud explicitly taught - and at the time it was repeated for mass consumption as if it was from the Bible, when it's not actually in the Bible. The majority of the slave ships and slave trading activity were in reality done by talmudists.
>The majority of the slave ships and slave trading activity were in reality done by talmudists
It wasn't. You are erratically falling for Hotep lies. Also the name the ship was registered is not an accurate way to measure it just like using marine flags and registration doesn't.
>It wasn't. You are erratically falling for Hotep lies. Also the name the ship was registered is not an accurate way to measure it just like using marine flags and registration doesn't.
Shalom.
אמר להם מהיכן אתם מביאים ראייה אמרו לו מן התורה אמר להן אף אני לא אביא לכם ראייה אלא מן התורה שנאמר (בראשית ט, כה) ויאמר ארור כנען עבד עבדים יהיה לאחיו עבד שקנה נכסים עבד למי ונכסים למי ולא עוד אלא שהרי כמה שנים שלא עבדתונו
Sanhedrin 91a:8
Geviha ben Pesisa said to them: From where are you citing proof that the land of Canaan is yours? They said to him: From the Torah. Geviha ben Pesisa said to them: I too will cite proof to you only from the Torah, as it is stated: “And he said: Cursed will be Canaan; a slave of slaves shall he be to his brethren” (Genesis 9:25). And with regard to a slave who acquired property, the slave belongs to whom and the property belongs to whom? The slave and his property belong to the master. And moreover, it is several years now that you have not served us. Therefore, not only are you not entitled to the land, there are additional debts that must be repaid, as well as a return to enslavement.
>It wasn't. You are erratically falling for Hotep lies. Also the name the ship was registered is not an accurate way to measure it just like using marine flags and registration doesn't.
Shalom.
אמר להם מהיכן אתם מביאים ראייה אמרו לו מן התורה אמר להן אף אני לא אביא לכם ראייה אלא מן התורה שנאמר (בראשית ט, כה) ויאמר ארור כנען עבד עבדים יהיה לאחיו עבד שקנה נכסים עבד למי ונכסים למי ולא עוד אלא שהרי כמה שנים שלא עבדתונו
Sanhedrin 91a:8
Geviha ben Pesisa said to them: From where are you citing proof that the land of Canaan is yours? They said to him: From the Torah. Geviha ben Pesisa said to them: I too will cite proof to you only from the Torah, as it is stated: “And he said: Cursed will be Canaan; a slave of slaves shall he be to his brethren” (Genesis 9:25). And with regard to a slave who acquired property, the slave belongs to whom and the property belongs to whom? The slave and his property belong to the master. And moreover, it is several years now that you have not served us. Therefore, not only are you not entitled to the land, there are additional debts that must be repaid, as well as a return to enslavement.
1/2
Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer 24:1
ברך נח ובניו שנא' ויברך אותם אלהים במתנותיה והנחילם את כל הארץ. ברך לשם ולבניו שחורים ונאים והנחילם את כל ארץ נושבת ברך לחם ובניו שחורים כעורב והנחילם חוף הים ברך ליפת ובניו כלם לבני' ויפי' והנחילם מדבר ושדות אלה הנחלות שהנחילם.
NIMROD AND THE TOWER OF BABEL
Noah brought his sons and his grandsons, and he blessed them with their (several) settlements, and he gave them as an inheritance all the earth. He especially blessed Shem and his sons, (making them) dark but comely, and he gave them the habitable earth. He blessed Ham and his sons, (making them) dark || like the raven, and he gave them as an inheritance the coast of the sea. He blessed Japheth and his sons, (making) them entirely white, and he gave them for an inheritance the desert and its fields…
First israeli Synagogue Was Dedicated in the United States
December 2, 1763
Many settlers traveled to the American colonies for freedom of worship. Quakers, Puritans, israelites, and people of other faiths arrived to create communities in what would become the United States. On December 2, 1763, members of the israeli community of Newport, Rhode Island, witnessed the dedication of the Touro Synagogue, the first synagogue in the American colonies. The synagogue was named for Isaac Touro, its first officiating rabbi. Touro became the center of a thriving israeli community.
https://www.americaslibrary.gov/jb/colonial/jb_colonial_israeli_1.html#:~:text=On%20December%202%2C%201763%2C%20members,of%20a%20thriving%20israeli%20community.
Near the peak of northern slavery in the 1750s, there were towns in the southern part of Rhode Island whose populations were as much as 30% Black and enslaved.
Between 1709 and 1807, Rhode Island merchants sponsored at least 934 slaving voyages to the coast of Africa and carried an estimated 106,544 slaves to the New World.”
https://www.middlepassageproject.org/2020/05/20/african-presence-in-rhode-island/#:~:text=Between%201709%20and%201807%2C%20Rhode,approximately%2059%2C070%20Africans%20in%20bondage.
The European-African slave trade began in AD 1455 when Pope Nicholas V of the Roman Catholic Church issued a Papel Bull authorizing the Kingdom of Portugal, ruled at that time by King Jaol II aka the Perfect, to authorize his subjects to enslave any Muslims or pagans they encountered on the West Coast of Africa south of Latitude 24N (this # may be wrong). No mention was made of race, nationality, ethnicity, skin color etc. This Bull was issued in response to slave raids conducted by African Muslims/pagans against Roman Catholics.
The justification was economical. There was a labor shortage and Africans supposed a perfect solution at that time. Americans knew they were humans, Americans knew it was not fair. But they saw the opportunity and took it. The rationalization came later.
Do you assume Christianity has any logical consistency?
They just make shit up, like they do to fit anything into their worldview. That's kinda the point of religion. Helps you cope with reality.
The Bible allows for slavery.
The Bible allows for abortion.
The bible says blacks aren't human
They aren't real Christians
bible says a lot of stuff
- that can be interpreted in anyway you find convenient
The Bible allows for the genocide of Israel's enemies.
They received personal permission from God when they contacted Him in 1658.
They convinced themselves that Africans were not human. Simple as that.
were they wrong? you could buy one for a handful of salt
Yes, unequivocally wrong. I could buy your mother for a handful of dollars but that doesn't make her subhuman.
sex and life aren't the same, I could buy a Black person's life with a handful of salt. That puts their value pretty low as a living creature. You could get more for a pig
>sex and life aren't the same
kek. virgin.
Do you ever get tired of thinking about black people every single second of every single day?
Kek
The Southern Baptist Church was intentionally created to soften the religious and moral implications of chattel slavery for one.
A lot of the mindset was that slavery was good for Africans and would civilize them (somehow), but stuff like being born into slavery, multiple generations being enslaved and raised entirely in the US with no connection to African culture, and families being broken up during the sale of slaves posed moral problems that were not lost on even the most ardently pro-slavery people.
the bible says slavery is okay
What really blows my mind is that Blacks are the most reliable group of Christians lmao. Imagine talking about cultural appropriation and being a cuck to the religion of your oppressor. Humiliating. Irreconcilable. Absolutely embarrassing. That goes for any of you "indio" Mexican Catholics as well.
Denial
Slavery in America was a israeli and Freemason operation, not a Christian one.
Slave owners didn't give a shit while the 99% where impoverished yeowmen farmer strivers that couldn't be fricking bothered to care. This is why Whigs could have aaved US and stopped the CW from happening, all they had to do was induatrialize the south, crush slaver power via capitalist power and then end the rotten piece of shit by choking it with the hands of proletarianized yeowmen and crushed with industrial steel.
>it's not the South's fault!
lel. almost got me there Cleetus.
I'm an Eastern Euro commie who is autistically obsessed with early American history, and what could have been different to prevent the rise of the great satan we see today. Yes, it was the slavers fault, because in early US the yeowman couldn't really vote, it was a beyond fricked political machine that only cared for the aristocratic vote. Yes, of course southerners were more racist, but not pathologically so. My post is more just me shitting on Jeffersonianism, because that is what killed the US from becoming more like Europe - Jeffersonian dream of self sufficient yeowmen farmers, and the autistic hate for centralization that followed it. National banks, infrastructure construction, incentives for capitalist production in the south - that is how US could have been saved.
>Yes, of course southerners were more racist, but not pathologically so
The years after says otherwise.
>Jeffersonian dream of self sufficient yeowmen farmers
is a dumb one because a society of farmers goes nowhere.
1.) They used certain Biblical passages to justify slavery
2.) Slavery was often justified as a way to turn pagan or Muslim Africans into Christians, saying "It's for their own good!"
>1.) They used certain Talmudic passages to justify slavery
fix'd that for you
They were not christians, they were mostly animists forced to convert into christianity (and they gained some right through that conversion), but for the owners it was more or less like baptising cattle, they didn't really care.
Many in the South believed (or convinced themselves to believe) that God had created the African to be the slave of the white man, that this was his divine order.
Ironically enough, abolitionism arose from the Second Great Awakening in the North, and abolitionists were generally extremely religious people who believed that slavery was not just a political wrong, but a moral sin.
You saw similar stuff back in the Middle Ages when the Catholic Church had almost complete control of scripture, and priests were able to pick and choose versus that encouraged serfs to believe that this was the divine order of God; that they were peasants because God had intended them to be peasants, that the social order was divinely ordained. This is why it was such a massive deal when Martin Luther translated the Bible into German; it made the Bible accessible to many more people, and they could see all the parts of the Bible that had been conveniently left out of the sermons.
>Many in the South believed (or convinced themselves to believe) that God had created the African to be the slave of the white man
That was one of the things that the Talmud explicitly taught - and at the time it was repeated for mass consumption as if it was from the Bible, when it's not actually in the Bible. The majority of the slave ships and slave trading activity were in reality done by talmudists.
>The majority of the slave ships and slave trading activity were in reality done by talmudists
It wasn't. You are erratically falling for Hotep lies. Also the name the ship was registered is not an accurate way to measure it just like using marine flags and registration doesn't.
>It wasn't. You are erratically falling for Hotep lies. Also the name the ship was registered is not an accurate way to measure it just like using marine flags and registration doesn't.
Shalom.
אמר להם מהיכן אתם מביאים ראייה אמרו לו מן התורה אמר להן אף אני לא אביא לכם ראייה אלא מן התורה שנאמר (בראשית ט, כה) ויאמר ארור כנען עבד עבדים יהיה לאחיו עבד שקנה נכסים עבד למי ונכסים למי ולא עוד אלא שהרי כמה שנים שלא עבדתונו
Sanhedrin 91a:8
Geviha ben Pesisa said to them: From where are you citing proof that the land of Canaan is yours? They said to him: From the Torah. Geviha ben Pesisa said to them: I too will cite proof to you only from the Torah, as it is stated: “And he said: Cursed will be Canaan; a slave of slaves shall he be to his brethren” (Genesis 9:25). And with regard to a slave who acquired property, the slave belongs to whom and the property belongs to whom? The slave and his property belong to the master. And moreover, it is several years now that you have not served us. Therefore, not only are you not entitled to the land, there are additional debts that must be repaid, as well as a return to enslavement.
1/2
Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer 24:1
ברך נח ובניו שנא' ויברך אותם אלהים במתנותיה והנחילם את כל הארץ. ברך לשם ולבניו שחורים ונאים והנחילם את כל ארץ נושבת ברך לחם ובניו שחורים כעורב והנחילם חוף הים ברך ליפת ובניו כלם לבני' ויפי' והנחילם מדבר ושדות אלה הנחלות שהנחילם.
NIMROD AND THE TOWER OF BABEL
Noah brought his sons and his grandsons, and he blessed them with their (several) settlements, and he gave them as an inheritance all the earth. He especially blessed Shem and his sons, (making them) dark but comely, and he gave them the habitable earth. He blessed Ham and his sons, (making them) dark || like the raven, and he gave them as an inheritance the coast of the sea. He blessed Japheth and his sons, (making) them entirely white, and he gave them for an inheritance the desert and its fields…
Shalom
First israeli Synagogue Was Dedicated in the United States
December 2, 1763
Many settlers traveled to the American colonies for freedom of worship. Quakers, Puritans, israelites, and people of other faiths arrived to create communities in what would become the United States. On December 2, 1763, members of the israeli community of Newport, Rhode Island, witnessed the dedication of the Touro Synagogue, the first synagogue in the American colonies. The synagogue was named for Isaac Touro, its first officiating rabbi. Touro became the center of a thriving israeli community.
https://www.americaslibrary.gov/jb/colonial/jb_colonial_israeli_1.html#:~:text=On%20December%202%2C%201763%2C%20members,of%20a%20thriving%20israeli%20community.
Near the peak of northern slavery in the 1750s, there were towns in the southern part of Rhode Island whose populations were as much as 30% Black and enslaved.
http://library.providence.edu/encompass/rhode-island-slavery-and-the-slave-trade/rhode-island-slavery-and-the-slave-trade/
Between 1709 and 1807, Rhode Island merchants sponsored at least 934 slaving voyages to the coast of Africa and carried an estimated 106,544 slaves to the New World.”
https://www.middlepassageproject.org/2020/05/20/african-presence-in-rhode-island/#:~:text=Between%201709%20and%201807%2C%20Rhode,approximately%2059%2C070%20Africans%20in%20bondage.
Slaves, obey your masters
They make shit up and lie.
Curse of Ham
The European-African slave trade began in AD 1455 when Pope Nicholas V of the Roman Catholic Church issued a Papel Bull authorizing the Kingdom of Portugal, ruled at that time by King Jaol II aka the Perfect, to authorize his subjects to enslave any Muslims or pagans they encountered on the West Coast of Africa south of Latitude 24N (this # may be wrong). No mention was made of race, nationality, ethnicity, skin color etc. This Bull was issued in response to slave raids conducted by African Muslims/pagans against Roman Catholics.
Ask yourself if the founder of Christianity would approve, anybody can claim anything but its the heart and actions that prove what a person is
Protestants are not Christians.
Catholics also enslaved Black folk in Spanish America you moronic papist.
The justification was economical. There was a labor shortage and Africans supposed a perfect solution at that time. Americans knew they were humans, Americans knew it was not fair. But they saw the opportunity and took it. The rationalization came later.
You're right you inferior.
Cool, stop clamoring to live around us then.
Us? Americans aren't White.mutt
>Anti-christian shill bot post