how do you respond to this without sounding mad?

how do you respond to this without sounding mad?

POSIWID: The Purpose Of A System Is What It Does Shirt $21.68

UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68

POSIWID: The Purpose Of A System Is What It Does Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    zoom out

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I don't respond and keep stacking because I'm not a literal mental moron handicapped frick freak

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    The banks are down like 35% then so uh, suck a fricking wiener? Something like 50% of all treasury issuances are stretched on the long tailed 10+ year maturity bonds which have gotten butt fricked

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Forgot pic

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >The banks are down like 35%
      no
      they're down on 10Y+ bonds and CRE
      they're now begging for the SLR to be extended indefinitely

      meaning: they're down 99%

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        They’re just asking to tie up less cash for long bonds, that’s pretty fricking bullish actually. More money to spend, more assets bought. I’m pretty sure that’s every libertarians wet dream actually, that Janet yellen breaks down crying and admits Basel reforms stifled competitive market growth of banking capital so they’re going under

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        hold on
        theoretically speaking
        if the fed completely disregards US treasuries for leverage ratios
        doesn't that imply that banks can just buy infinite amounts of us treasury bonds?

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          AA- or higher sovereign bonds (and gold) can be leveraged as high as the bank wants
          they need to pay to borrow the money though

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          yes and that means infinite money printing

          is this currently implemented? is the US disregarding treasury holdings right now for leverage ratios? or not?

          yes, SLR is currently suspended

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        is this currently implemented? is the US disregarding treasury holdings right now for leverage ratios? or not?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >They’re just asking to tie up less cash for long bonds
        because they're fricking REKT from the hikes
        it sent their asset to liab ratio to the fricking gutter
        credit suisse and signature were just unlucky, EVERY SINGLE US BANK has their exact same portfolio of RANCID SHIT

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Explain how leveraged shorts work

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    That's assuming you bought one singular time at old ATH.
    If you DCAd like you should or bought any other time, you would have made a massive profit
    Scenario is dumb, you are focussing on the worst time to buy as only entry point and conviniently ignore every other point in time

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Found the redditor

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Even when they cherrypick the absolute worst time to buy, they still have to acknowledge that you wouldn't have lost money, and it just shows that even if you pick the worst time to buy before a market crash, it will always bounce back if you simply wait long enough

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    all money inside his bank is gone
    he should respond to that first

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    all the replies to this thread are literally moronic moronic homosexuals where did all the informed users go? why is it just zoomer shit eating piss spewing fricking insufferably moronic homosexuals now

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    call him a Black person homosexual

  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    its tag has nfts on it, so his opinion is invalid and economic knowledge fidgety at best, and what's he says about inflation? give me a break truflation said with hard data that btc is actually worth more if we take inflation into the math. gimme a break homosexual

  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Zoom in

  12. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    you bought the top of the previous bull market if you had bought 1 year before or 1 year after you would be in significant profit

  13. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I don't, I usually don't post for free

  14. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I bought at 65k then, and I'm buying $65k today. And I'm up, way up.

  15. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    If you bought the absolute peak 3 years ago and held the hold time, you definitely had the conviction to buy when it was sub20kso you would've decreased your cost basis.

  16. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    btc is a pump and dump

    if you failed to buy the exact bottom and sell the exact top thats a skill issue

  17. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    i sold bitcoin 3 years ago

  18. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >implying the 15% inflation doesn't count when you invest in non-crypto assets.

  19. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Fck her mother

  20. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Is like ppl who says crypto holder are rtrds, I do 100x with my AGRS, and the same sht is coming from rtrds

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Same

  21. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    in summary

    fiacels have no money
    but of course, they don't really know that since they just live paycheck to paycheck
    they have no idea their bank is insolvent

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *