how do you respond to this without sounding mad?
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68 |
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
how do you respond to this without sounding mad?
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68 |
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
zoom out
I don't respond and keep stacking because I'm not a literal mental moron handicapped frick freak
The banks are down like 35% then so uh, suck a fricking wiener? Something like 50% of all treasury issuances are stretched on the long tailed 10+ year maturity bonds which have gotten butt fricked
Forgot pic
>The banks are down like 35%
no
they're down on 10Y+ bonds and CRE
they're now begging for the SLR to be extended indefinitely
meaning: they're down 99%
They’re just asking to tie up less cash for long bonds, that’s pretty fricking bullish actually. More money to spend, more assets bought. I’m pretty sure that’s every libertarians wet dream actually, that Janet yellen breaks down crying and admits Basel reforms stifled competitive market growth of banking capital so they’re going under
hold on
theoretically speaking
if the fed completely disregards US treasuries for leverage ratios
doesn't that imply that banks can just buy infinite amounts of us treasury bonds?
AA- or higher sovereign bonds (and gold) can be leveraged as high as the bank wants
they need to pay to borrow the money though
yes and that means infinite money printing
yes, SLR is currently suspended
is this currently implemented? is the US disregarding treasury holdings right now for leverage ratios? or not?
>They’re just asking to tie up less cash for long bonds
because they're fricking REKT from the hikes
it sent their asset to liab ratio to the fricking gutter
credit suisse and signature were just unlucky, EVERY SINGLE US BANK has their exact same portfolio of RANCID SHIT
Explain how leveraged shorts work
That's assuming you bought one singular time at old ATH.
If you DCAd like you should or bought any other time, you would have made a massive profit
Scenario is dumb, you are focussing on the worst time to buy as only entry point and conviniently ignore every other point in time
Found the redditor
Even when they cherrypick the absolute worst time to buy, they still have to acknowledge that you wouldn't have lost money, and it just shows that even if you pick the worst time to buy before a market crash, it will always bounce back if you simply wait long enough
all money inside his bank is gone
he should respond to that first
all the replies to this thread are literally moronic moronic homosexuals where did all the informed users go? why is it just zoomer shit eating piss spewing fricking insufferably moronic homosexuals now
call him a Black person homosexual
its tag has nfts on it, so his opinion is invalid and economic knowledge fidgety at best, and what's he says about inflation? give me a break truflation said with hard data that btc is actually worth more if we take inflation into the math. gimme a break homosexual
Zoom in
you bought the top of the previous bull market if you had bought 1 year before or 1 year after you would be in significant profit
I don't, I usually don't post for free
I bought at 65k then, and I'm buying $65k today. And I'm up, way up.
If you bought the absolute peak 3 years ago and held the hold time, you definitely had the conviction to buy when it was sub20kso you would've decreased your cost basis.
btc is a pump and dump
if you failed to buy the exact bottom and sell the exact top thats a skill issue
i sold bitcoin 3 years ago
>implying the 15% inflation doesn't count when you invest in non-crypto assets.
Fck her mother
Is like ppl who says crypto holder are rtrds, I do 100x with my AGRS, and the same sht is coming from rtrds
Same
in summary
fiacels have no money
but of course, they don't really know that since they just live paycheck to paycheck
they have no idea their bank is insolvent