in history, was it germany that was uniquely evil in a european context, or britain that was uniquely good?
 |
 Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
|
in history, was it germany that was uniquely evil in a european context, or britain that was uniquely good?
Germany was only uniquely evil for a twelve year period.
During which time it deliberately modeled itself in its conduct and aims on the Anglo-Saxon nations of Britain and the USA. Britain and America are basically non-autistic versions of Nazi Germany which the Nazis sought to emulate but bungled thanks to their German autism.
It's important to remember that ALL Germanic peoples are evil.
>seething med still mad Odoacer fricked his empire
Germanic peoples arose to prominence by destroying Rome and sweeping over less advantaged and developed neighbours. Because their great formative 'folk-wondering' epoch occurred at a time when they were destroying both more advanced and less advanced peoples it fixed in the minds of Germanics a barbaric and resentful insolence against actual civilisation alongside a callous and sadistic contempt of the strong for the weak. They have never outgrown this adolescent cruelty they adopted during the subjugation of the Latin and destruction of the Celtic peoples. The Germanic human being is still fixed in the instinct of spiteful and gratuitous destruction he learned in the ruins of the world he brought down.
Bear in mind that Anglo-Saxons (including Lowland Scots), Ashkenazim and Afro-Saxons are Germanic peoples. American culture is a disgusting Germanic stew-pot with contributions from Germanicised Britons, Germanicised Africans, and Germanicised israelites.
Oh yeah bro. The Mediterranean world was so advanced and wonderful. That’s why Romans fled en masse their cities to live in the countryside, away from the Enlightened Roman Government. It’s why the Germans were able to to recruit thousands of Roman subjects to fight alongside them. Rome is just so awesome. I fricking love wooden coins and being forced into a caste system. What Gallic man wouldn’t want to be burned alive for not wanting to die in some stupid war against the Sassanids because their emperor called your lead poisoned emperor a roody poo.
It’s so sad the Germanic tribes ended the Roman empire. I also wish I could have sold my bussy to a Patrician landowner in exchange for some bread.
The fall of Rome was objectively a civilisational catastrophic whose impact can be seen in the archaeological record in the form of a steep technological decline.
>not doing everything possible to appease the anglos is autism
i would disagree, hitler tried his best to get an alliance or at least an entante with britain, but they refused to let germany have its own sphere of influence because they are exceptionally selfish and evil people
Only if you focus on the genocide part instead of the cultural and political differences.
German autism being not totally submitting yourself to the israelites like the anglos did
Both of those empires were evil, but only one won
>hurr durr germans were evil
reminder it was the british that funded war across europe for several centuries and ended their empire with the most destructive war in history
say what you want about the commies but they didn't end their empire with ww3
won what ?
britain arguably won ww1 by stealing some less than worthless colonies but they absolutely lost ww2 in every sense.
Someone had to stop Ashkenazi and their mongrel Prussian lapdogs.
We Continental Germans spread their legs for israeli dick for 1000 years to the point Yiddish is considered a High Germanic language and “Germans” had to pass racial purity laws to figure out who wasn’t a mischling yet.
You’re also welcome for the English draining Europe of israelites and sending them back to where they belong: the middle-east, where they’re stuck in an attritional war of annihilation against the muslim world spending all their ill-gotten wealth.
oh wow a neo-nazi. I'm sure everybody is very interested in your heiling and b***hing.
oh wow a commie. I'm sure everybody is very interested in your heiling and b***hing
>but those other freaks!
that's cope freak.
t. tiro dliate
>hur dur “genocide isn’t a bad thing”
>being so desperate that you pad out the Axis with "i think we'll stay home" Spain, two neutral countries occupied by the USSR (Estonia and Latvia) and one neutral country occupied by Germany (Denmark)
This answer proves that Germany was uniquely good.
13402126
>contributing nothing to the discussion
Britain became uniquely evil in the seventeenth century when it became a de facto atheist state where no authority higher than parliament was acknowledged. Earlier they had cast off the religious authority of the pope, but that was at least partially justified as even in those days his role as a mediator had become something of a joke.
But then they—inexplicably—decided because God sent them one bad king, on account of their sins, that they should simply make the king a puppet ruler to serve their dictatorship. At this point England became completely divorced from the divine foundation of its civilization, and began a very rapid spiritual decline, despite its material successes. Dynasties that—however ineffectually—tried to preserve European Tradition became their sworn enemies. Britain gained nothing from its ridiculous wars in this period, but it didn't know how to stop fighting them. Hundreds of thousands of dead Europeans was just a fair price to pay to keep the latest Louis from annexing a few Flemish towns, apparently. Hell, 900,000 Britons was even seen as a fair price to keep Alsace-Lorraine out of German hands.
At least fighting the godless tyrant was worthwhile enough.
Godless tyrant Bonaparte, I meant.
This is unbelievably similar to how the Zgay Putin apologists write
Very good post. The Irish pamphleteer Brendan Clifford is very good on peeling back the Nietzschean ethic of post-Reformation Britain:
>The great Protestant Archbishop of Dublin, William King— by far the greatest there has ever been—gave Evil a secular meaning even though he was writing during the high tide of Protestant Ascendancy. He said that Evil was what obstructs the will—what obstructs the will is Evil.God is wilful. His will knows no superior authority. What he wills is good, and whatever obstructs it is evil. And, since man is made in the image of God, the same is the case with him. Man is a little God. He is intolerant of anything that obstructs his will, and he calls it Evil.We can understand that. It is perfectly clear. And it is entirely in accordance with the conduct of the interest served by Archbishop King—the interest of the British State which he played an active part in constructing.
'On Democratic War', Church and State, No, 129, Third Quarter 2017, 2.
the huge amount of irish neo-nazis has really soured me on the irish lately. maybe it's because they're sheepfrickers on a small foggy island that they lack all perspective.
Irish are unironically probably the least racist people in Europe. In spite if the massive and unprecedented demographic change created by mass immigration in recent decades in Ireland there are no anti-immigrant parties with significant support, hence why those few Irish people who are genuinely racist congregate together on IQfy.
anti british, pro german sentiment which generally results in a form of nazism is very common in irish "thinkers" motivated purely by a provincial inferiority complex towards britain.
irish manage to be pro-nazi while also being pro commie and pro immigrant simultenously.
Translation: your imagination perceives the Irish as some kind of Frankenstein monster constructed out out of every past or present real or perceived threat to the British state.
>Was/is Germany uniquely evil
>Was/is Britain uniquely good
Yes.
Germany and Britain are moral equivalents in WWII. If Britain lost they would be painted by history as villains and Germany as heroes.
>wRiTtEn By Da WiNnErS
moron
Who cares about good or evil
What matters is that you won. You conquered the world, got the resources, obtained the highest standard of living, invented shit and went as far as possible on the tech tree.
Happiness and spirituality are memes and just Black person cope
Its a different kind of psychopathy, the sucessful English are perfidious, cold, calculating sociopaths, imagine the upper class snotty school bully. The Germans kind of evil is more like autistic rage and callousness in addition to their persecution complex, basically the school shooter of europe.
Also a very good post. The English upper class are essentially the realisation of what Nietzsche meant by his Ubermensch idea, for better or worse (the answer is worse).
>But the NATO position, as far as we recall, was based on the First–Strike option, which in practice assumed that a conventionally-armed enemy was on the point of winning. Is such a position imaginable with regard to Britain today? Where is such an enemy to be found?But the sovereign power in the West is America. All else is derivative from American Power. And in America the popular slogan at one time was Better Dead Than Red. America was the salt of the Earth. The Earth would be tasteless without it. If the American mission in the world inherited from the English Puritanism in which it originated—was in serious danger of failing, it would be better that civilisation in general should be destroyed.That is in the spirit of absolute Millenarian sovereignty brought into world affairs by the fundamentalist English breakaway five hundred years ago from the pragmatic European consensus of a thousand years. Europe existed in a long-term dynamic of conflict between Church and State—Papacy and Empire. England withdrew and formed itself into an Empire in which Church and State were one, and Good and Evil were determined exclusively by the interests of the State. A Protestant Archbishop of Dublin three hundred years ago, William King, gave lucid expression to this view of the world in his Problem Of Evil. Evil, he said, was whatever obstructed the Will. And that is exactly how America sees it today. And Europe, which is a product of American will, and has no will of its own, dare not see it differently.
Brendan Clifford, Iran: Reflections On Money And Power, Church and State editorial, January, 2020.
Brendan Clifford used to be an Anglophile unionist who was deeply hostile to Irish nationalism until he realised in middle age that he had been conned by the measured and understated rhetoric of British ideology and historiography. I don't know of any figure who has made such a sudden turn from cringe to sharply and insightfully based.
>I-It's the pr*tties fault!
Holy shit shut the frick up
The thing is even British propaganda of WWI (correctly) had an implicit stance not far from 'it's the protties fault' in singling out the Prussianisiation of Germany as the cause of its pathologies. Prussianism had its roots in the fusion between medieval eastward crusading and a particularly sinister ethos of Calvinism which took root in the Hohenzollern lands.
Maxim to always keep in mind: infer British objectives from British actions, not British rhetoric. It may sound like a cynical universal maxim (infer objective from actions not claims) which I have arbitrarily applied to Britain but it is not. Britain is uniquely deceptive and uniquely convincing in its deception and one must be constantly presume the worst when assessing its motives as a salutary corrective to its eloquent moral pretensions.
>The land of Schiller, Beethoven, Mozart, Kant, Hegel, Nietzsche, Heidegger, Wagner, Weber, Marx, Mann, Hesse, Göthe and Strauss was uniquely evil.
What did Anglos ever give humanity? Global capitalism? Consumerism? Autistic analytic philosophy?
a lot of good poetry to be fair
>Schiller, Beethoven, Mozart
Romans
>Wagner
Jew
>Kant, Hegel, Nietzsche, Heidegger
hacks
>Marx, Mann
commies
>Hesse
Swiss
>Strauss
Austrian Bohemiaphile
killshot, gott'im
Very American post
>Marx
>German
Both
90% of what brownies attribute applies only to Germanics.
*attribute to wypipo in general only applies to Germanics
Before the 1800s the undisputed evils in Europe were Russia and Sweden with Austria and Spain at shared second place