Jesus Christ!

Alright, I’m going to try and word this as clearly as I can: Which translation of the Bible, as it is understood to be within the faith of Christianity, is the most linguistically accurate and secular? I don’t care for the numerous denominations and ideological hijackings before or after the death of Christ, and admittedly, I don’t know much about the the scriptural history of Christianity or Christianity itself for that matter nor would I consider myself a conceptual Christian but that is irrelevant. I am looking for a diligently produced and/or linguistically faithful scholarly translation of the original Hebrew corpus of texts concerning the teachings and deeds of Christ and whatever other books are commonly grouped therewith.

A Conspiracy Theorist Is Talking Shirt $21.68

Black Rifle Cuck Company, Conservative Humor Shirt $21.68

A Conspiracy Theorist Is Talking Shirt $21.68

  1. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    connect to the akashic records(wireless)

  2. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    Why do you care so much about semantics when you can’t even providence evidence of his supposed existence?

    That said, probably Ancient Greek and ancient Hebrew

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      I don’t care to bicker over such a tired subject. I don’t really care whether Jesus as a living human being existed or not in the parameters given within Biblical literature, however, the conceptual “Jesus” being a person (or perhaps - group of people) of which many highly influential texts and philosophies are attributed to is evidently a far-reaching entity that has inflicted profound consequences upon the global word that ought to be understood and, >God< forbid, maybe even appreciated, rather than dismissed as some non-entity that is metaphysically insignificant/meaningless because of….. a lack of physical evidence? Perception is reality, my friend, and Jesus is VERY real to many.

  3. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    King James Version. All others are works of the wisdom of men.

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      This is what Terry Davis, God rest his soul, used to emphasize many times over that the KJV is what ought to be adhered to and I have reason to take his word for it but I wondered if there were any other obscure scholarly options

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        Terry was a Catholic. Why would he say this?
        It's a good translation, but not without flaws. And King James himself was a homosexual.

        • 8 months ago
          Anonymous

          I might be mistaken. I just remember it being a recurring thing that he would talk about.

  4. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    NRSV, just be mindful of the footnotes whenever they introduce gender-neutral language ("brothers and sisters" instead of "brothers").
    It's the most popular translation among academic bible scholars (many of whom are secular), as well as being approved by Catholics and many denominations of Protestants.

  5. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    Whichever one has the Latin Vulgate and doesn’t use gender neutral language.

  6. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    NRSV with apocrypha is what you're looking for

  7. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    Who fricking cares, just read the god damn book you b***h. You probably won't even get past the Torah you stupid frick. Even if an anon pointed you in the direction of the true, living, breathing word of God I doubt you would even make it past the flood you stupid mother fricker. Just read the damn Bible, pick a fricking version. Your the type to Google the differences between the game of the year edition, platinum edition and remastered version of Skyrim and ask about it on reddit you midwit honkey.

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      >your

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Your a midwit honkey

  8. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    Didn't David Bentley Hart do a New Testament translation that tried to stay as close to the original Greek as linguistically possible, regardless of the doctrinal implications?

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      Yes, it's pretty entertaining.
      However
      a) it's hardly "scholarly" like the OP requests. He's just some guy doing the entire NT by himself. He has a PhD in religious studies but not related to translation (his thesis was "Beauty, Violence, and Infinity: A Question Concerning Christian Rhetoric"); and
      b) He isn't unbiased. He's a universalist who rejects eternal hell, and according to himself he was shocked by how much his translation ended up proving his beliefs.
      So I wouldn't recommend it as a primary translation without something else to compare it with

  9. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    >most linguistically accurate and secular

  10. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    >translation

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      Some of us severely left brained and can’t do og languages

  11. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    BSB is sharp, Word on Fire is a great NT, you could try rolling with some interlinears. compare everything else in Biblehub with other translations and the originals.

  12. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    KJV is the only legit one, watch some of this if interested https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=edbc8mH9ylY

  13. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    NASB is pretty good. Has implied stuff in italics.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *