This man revolutionised the way we view open source software and has brought about the year of the linux desktop. Thank him.
This man revolutionised the way we view open source software and has brought about the year of the linux desktop.
This man revolutionised the way we view open source software and has brought about the year of the linux desktop. Thank him.
Thank you Terry Davis
thank you
Why is that dropdown menu empty?
This post is just obtuse and uninformed venting which I won’t dignify with a comment.
destroy everything so something newer and better can rise from the ashes
I respect that
What's the use case for thanking?
This but unironically. GNOME is the best DE on Linux.
"Thank yous" are not a metric.
the 'uck dislikes this post and disagrees with you
pic unrelated
why does IQfy always have to harass random people? He did more last week for the world than all of you basement dwelling incels do in your whole lifetime
Hi ebussi
thanks for proving my point idiots
>harass
>random ppl
go back
hahaha hey ebussi don't you have some features to remove?
>random people
you are delusional
Just wanted to give you another (You), you deserve it
ebussi. is your bussy smooth?
i think it is, personally
smooth and featureless...
How's your troony "wife" doing ?
what's the usecase of this anonymous fellatio?
IQfy will seethe, but this is true.
This thread is basically as bad as kiwi farms garbage. Maybe if people keep it up we can get meme providers to start banning IQfy and jannies will have to clean it up.
I fail to see how we are even remotely like kiwi farms
ebussy threads have been nothing but harmless banter and a mild critique of the way he works
literally go outside and touch grass, get some sun on your face, holy shit
Hey Klassy, how's the icon theme coming? Still seething?
>did for the world
What's the use case?
Thanks ebassi! Awesome work, GNOME is great. I still hate Black folk and trannies though.
ick on eck
usy on bussy
we need an a ebussi meet and greet he probably has no idea how many fans he has on IQfy
>Microsoft needs an army of hundreds of 'jeets goodmorninging very hard to completely destroy windows and make it unusable
>Ebussy can do the same on gnome entirely by himself
Love him or hate him, you have to admire such an impressive feat.
Healthy gnome dev goes to gitlab, gets gaslit with massive shot of many WONTFIX, doesn't feel good and quits - EBUSSY. Many use cases!
You should thank this man, he alone pushed everyone away from trying software development, jobs are now secured
this is a rant from a kate developer about broken icons when using adwaita
why are gnome developers like this? are ebussy et al. getting paid to ruin everything?
>Gnome doesn't follow fdo
>Kde and valve have to go outside fdo just to get features
>Fdo is ban happy for people any troon mod doesn't like
Why even be a part of free desktop again?
They are Freedesktop.
It's a Redhat front, all of it
Lmao. I've seen that before
>Think about it:
>Linux has been fabulously successful everywhere it's used without Freedesktop.org involvement.
>Server Linux, embedded Linux, Android, ChromeOS.
>People's home routers and NASes use Linux and they don't complain about Linux -- because they aren't using some auteur's Desktop Environment.
>Linux isn't any more complicated under the covers than macOS or Windows.
Even though it has seen enough shilling here recently i really hope we get to see something like this in Cosmic, if only they're the only company having a real interest in selling a desktop experience.
https://cullmann.io/posts/kate-and-icons/
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/adwaita-icon-theme/-/issues/288
>remove icons from your theme because YOU don't need them
>still act like your theme is FDO specs-compliant and can be used as a fallback theme
>every non-GNOME app that follows the FDO specs specifically created to standardize things across desktops looks broken because your theme isn't following these standards
>GNOME devs act like this is everyone else's problem and even ask what's the user case for icons
Holy shit, no wonder why Linux Mint's devs want to fork even more stuff from GNOME.
bassi'd
clasen is such an underrated dickhead, not sure how ebussy managed to steal the spotlight from him
He runs the show
mainly because ebussy is the one that posts the most asinine comments where you just directly quote them to laugh in disbelief, clasen is equally a dickhead but he tends to just do the usual reddit-tier behavior of pretending to not get the point / being intentionally obtuse. his posts are just annoying without anything funny
He's a shitposter, Ebussy just bombs the feature requesters without irony
i think you give them far too much credit
Not looking like a greasy neckbeard goes a long way.
"Gnome user" should be a diagnosable disorder.
gnome developers are such gigantic homosexuals, holy shit
Holy shit Gnome is such a fricking shit show, something really needs to be done about them, and Red Hat needs to be bullied about them funding those fricking tards
>kate
>k
looks like a you problem
>KDE devs use internal features of GNOME components
>the latter never had any compatibility guarantees for external consumers
>random distro breaks because of that
Sounds like Kate needs to decide whether it wants to be a GNOME app, a KDE app or a Fedora app.
>internal features of GNOME components
Hi ebussy! The icon pack you advertise to the entire OS isn't internal to your shitty DE.
Please revert.
Maybe KDE shouldn't use the GNOME icon pack as its own. How come most other programs have no issues with this? Don't they have their own icons?
>gnometard doesn't understand his desktop integration works
No wonder GNOME programs stand out like tumours in every non-gnome environment.
The icon pack in question is not meant to be integrated into non-GNOME systems. It's a core part of the GNOME OS, but anyone who wants to use it outside that has to maintain compatibility on their own.
It brakes non gnome applications running on gnome, but fine, gnome don't want to follow the fdo spec in their fdo theme, so be it.
I hope devs let them stay broken on gnome instead of making workarounds to fix it cause moronic decisions should have consequences.
If non-GNOME applications want to run on GNOME OS, they should follow its conventions. It's unreasonable to expect all of GNOME to change just because some third-party app wants it to run differently.
They're following their conventions, they are following the FDO spec cause their theme states it's FDO, if gnome want to ignore the FDO spec they should stop advertising the theme as FDO.
The theme does not state that it is a FDO theme, merely that it is an icon theme.
Wrong.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/adwaita-icon-theme/-/issues/288#note_2094478
That just states that it's an icon theme. It's required in order for GNOME apps to be able to use it. If KDE expects it to also mean something else and not provide their own fallbacks, then that's their problem.
No, as it's now and set as default stating it's fdo and you should use it, and without a proper FDO compatible fallback it's pretty much broken, you might dislike the spec but that's what it is.
Unfortunately GTK shitware is a virus that gets pulled in even if you don't want it and it still advertises as standardncompliant because the entire point of it existing is being a roadblock for Linux's progression. Removing some leftover metadata they don't fricking use wouldn't cost them anything but the league of marvelous homosexuals to make it about themselves vs the world.
>his
*how
Honestly this looks like a typical divide and conquer strategy
I bet he's on microsoft's payroll
gnome has been dead since they turned it into a tablet UI
I would use gnome if bussy wasn't so thick skulled with features and feedback
Why hasn't there been successful attempts at making an xorg/wayland display server alternative?
Thank you ebased. I use GNOME every day. Sometimes I imagine how happy I'd be if only GNOME was usable.
apologize
no
>neckbeard poointheloonixtard
>"revolutionised"
He still can tho, by chopping of his dick and kys.
What's the use case of the year of the linux desktop?
He cares about the homies
If bussy wrote his own biography in third person, it says more about him than his general demeanor on the job does
why do you keep posting him and this thread?
nobody even uses gnome
Because he's somewhat of a lolcow and it amuses us.
>
As soon as COSMIC is out, I will never use GNOME again.
>is a desktop environment developed in the Rust programming language
nah I'm good
rust is objectively better
hating something because of a canard is moronic and shows you're still in the same mentality of being rejected by social circles in high school
just install openBSD because you're a contrarian at that point, and not because you actually want to use it
>hating something because of a canard is moronic and shows you're still in the same mentality of being rejected by social circles in high school
Better than JavaScript
IQfy is pro bloat nowadays, huh?
why would you need a 'thank'?
what's your use case for that?
issue closed
Nice bait homosexual
Why does his neckbeard look like a brillo pad
> All this GNOME bashing
AFAIK Slackware has the best GNOME implementation, and all others systems should follow their example.
There would be no more bashing if they did, I'll tell you what.
>Slackware
>GNOME
Are you moronic?
That's the joke, anon.
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xdg/xdg-specs/-/issues/132
Why the frick is Gnome still part of FDO?
>gnome developer
lmao
>use case
there's 2 of them?
praise ebussy, king of IQfy
What's the use case for this man?
What's the use case for revolutions?
What's the use case for opening a source?
What's the use case for bringing something about?
What's the use case for a year of linux desktops?
What's the use case for gratitude?
What's the user case for native themes?
When you right click in gnome you can't create a new document in the file manager nor the desktop. Amazing.
Guess we don't need the feature of creating new files.
I'll be sticking with linux mint until wayland becomes standard, and until KDE is worth anything.....
Why would your file manager need to be able to create various file formats? That's the job of whatever editor you're using to save the files.
>file manager shouldnt have touch capability
it should.
its a very basic feature. i dint know gnome lacks this ability. im glad i dont use it
Creating files and modifying their timestamps are two separate features. While a file manager could have a use for the latter, the former doesn't make as much sense.
How is the following operation not directly under a file manager's competence:
>copy "templates/New Document.odt" to Documents/" to create a new document
I'm listening.
The Gnome file manager does that. (At least it did when I last used it)
>WONTFIX
how do you respond without sounding mad?
WONTUSE
considering how many times he is posted here, how is he still not part of the sticky group photo?