Thoughts?

Haplogroups of ancient Hungarians

A Conspiracy Theorist Is Talking Shirt $21.68

Ape Out Shirt $21.68

A Conspiracy Theorist Is Talking Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    hapa

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      hapagroup*

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      They were similar in origin to a mixture of chechen and mongol

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      They were 94% European so the paternal non-European ancestry got diluted like in Finns.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Actually, modern Finns have more Siberian ancestry than their Finnic ancestor. Likely source for it is Sami. Here's coordinates of what N1c carriers to Finland looked like:

        RUS_Ingria_IA,0.1234985,0.1152625,0.0961655,0.091732,0.0450855,0.0376505,0.012103,0.022268,-0.0010225,-0.0380875,0.00203,-0.015661,0.029063,0.0364015,-0.0095685,-0.0106735,-0.009518,0.00095,0.0027025,-0.001251,-0.005116,-0.004328,0.006532,-0.0107245,-0.0026345

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          It's Finnic ancestor for the Balts, not for the Finns

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            If he is ancestor of the Balts, he is mine too (N1c L550). Finnic ancestry came from the Baltic to Finland, while Sami ancestry most likely came from the east.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Most Finns have the same(or relatively closely related to be specific) subclade as NEO538 which was enormously Siberian
            of the 62% or so men with N1c in Finland only 1/4 belong to what you might call Estonic or Baltic subclades and vast majority of them aren't L550

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            N-L550 is an elite royal norse-baltic clade

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Maybe but it originated in Estonia. It just didn't become common there or Finland.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Isn't it in lithuania?

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            The oldest samples that have it are from Estonia. Then it shows up in Lithuania and Latvia centuries later. It's also pretty common in eastern Sweden and actually it's less bottlenecked there than in Baltics.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            It's amazing how nganasan-udmurtoids raped eastern europe so hard

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Balto-Slavs are just weird weak cucks imo

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >Most Finns have the same(or relatively closely related to be specific) subclade as NEO538 which was enormously Siberian
            Which isn't Finnic ancestors of Finns, but Sami.

  2. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Most famous Hungarian movie character is named Matthew Schneider

    Oh gee. I wonder which race Magyars are.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      They're mongols

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        They’re krauts who speak an eastern tongue.

  3. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    J1?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      G2abVLLS we're back in the game!

      They were from caucasus

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Weren't they from Khazakstan?

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          mongols mixed with caucasians

  4. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    G2abVLLS we're back in the game!

  5. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >haplogroups
    Jump in front of active traffic homosexual, these threads are pure fricking cancer every single time

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      anti-haplogroup homosexual detected

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      it's the only part of history that gets published in actual scientific articles

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >the thing that requires a laboratory to do is more science oriented
        Woah; there is also archaeometallurgy btw

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Yes, this is real history, a real study of the past, not the made up bullshit of a byzantine homosexual from a thousand years ago

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            you know that genetics alone doesn't tell you anything about what a people's culture is like, roght? Genetics always works with other branches of historical research

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Paleogenetics studies how migrations and ethnogenesis of ancient peoples occurred. Who the ancient people really were. Only Black folks who believe they're ancient Egyptians or pajeets who think they're Aryans don't like it.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            I never said I don't like it; but it's part of a larger research, because as I said, it doesn't give any info on the culture and we know that genetics doesn't tranlsate in a particular language or belief

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Genetics stands above culture and language because peoples and ethnicities are defined by their origins, i.e. their genetics. Genetics determines physical development, psyche and intelligence, and that determines cultural characteristics. Also, as far as I know, globular amphora culture was previously thought to be Indo-European until their dna was tested

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Genetics is not history and history is not a science.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          at least we can estimate one historical fact from Y-DNA haplogroup, which is the paternal lineage of a human group. And it is well-known that the culture had been inherited from father to son in many societies, especially in the agricultural societies. We have no reason to ignore it.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >culture had been inherited from father to son in many societies, especially in the agricultural societies
            Not exactly a hard rule. And all it takes is a single son in the chain of hundreds of generations to break that "rule" for you to reach completely false conclusions on the culture of all of his descendants. You can use archeogenetics to support already existing historical evidence, but by itself it's not history.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Paleogenetics and archaeology are part of history. No one cares that you're poor and can't afford to buy a dna test

  6. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Proves the Chronica Hungarorum was not fake and gay.

  7. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Yeah don't care, it's still just astrology for men

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *